Talk:Katie and Emily/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewing right now... // Gbern3 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting: Meets all GA criteria as listed here.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose and grammar): Green tickY b (MoS): Green tickY
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Green tickY b (citations to reliable sources): Green tickY c (OR): Green tickY
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Green tickY b (focused): Green tickY
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Green tickY
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Green tickY
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Green tickY b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Green tickY
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations. I was going to place this article on hold for GA promotion b/c I wasn't sure if the plot section needed references/citations. After checking four other GA-rated TV episode articles (none of which had refs in the plot section), I decided this promotion was justly deserved. I saw this article has been listed since July. You've been very patient. // Gbern3 (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. —97198 (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]