Talk:Keichousaurus

	Keichousaurus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the amazon in my home the brazillian rainforest m great grandfather found i small reptile lokking creature near by a cave in the far east of the amazon. about 4 months later we found some bones of a head and a long neck inside the walls of the cave. we never seen nothing like it.

interesting, but this talk page is for discussion on the article: how it should be changed, problems, things like that. Keichousaurus is known only from Asia, so what ever you found is something else. peace! Ryan shell (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes[edit]

Is this perhaps being used for a school project right now? I'd feel kind of stupid cleaning up someone's class project.

I hid the added cladogram because it is a direct copy/paste of this link. I didn't remove it because it could be useable if reworked. J. Spencer (talk) 01:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No real links here; perhaps link to http://www.paleoart.co.uk/images/pic004.jpg ? Practically only decent reconstruction on the net for K. hui. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Necrographical (talk • contribs) 00:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keichousaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080429200032/http://www.peripatus.gen.nz/Taxa/Chordata/Keichousaurus.html to http://www.peripatus.gen.nz/Taxa/Chordata/Keichousaurus.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full picture[edit]

https://www.picclickimg.com/d/l400/pict/142858163166_/Keichousaurus-hui-Schwimmsaurier-Skelett-Saurierskelett-Highlight-vollst%C3%A4ndig.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.159.6.199 (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the authenticity of the 2.7-meter Keichousaurus[edit]

Is the 2.7 meter fossil of the creature presented in the source really a Keichousaurus? I searched for an academic treatise about the fossil, but couldn't find it, and I'm not sure if this fossil really belongs to Keichousaurus. Even in the image search, there were only articles about the existence of dragons, and nothing was found about the name of the specific museum where the fossil is exhibited or detailed fossil information. This is lacking credibility as a source. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]