Talk:Keith-Smith v Williams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use of Yahoo Groups[edit]

I'm concerned that there is such a reliance on individual messages from Yahoo groups to lay out Tracy William's views. I'm not claiming that she didn't support the BNP but that (1) this is an issue where we are dealing with a living person's reputation so we need to be extremely mindful (see WP:BLP, (2) the Yahoo groups are primary sources so really should not be used for what could be seen as an attack on her and certainly not synthesized as such (see WP:PRIMARY and WP:SYNTH) and (3) the case was about the late Michael Keith-Smith's reputation and not that of Tracy William's so we don't need large quotations about her rather odd views (see WP:UNDUE).

If there are reliable third party reports stating that she was a self confessed BNP supporter then these may be included, but I really don't see a place for her postings on Arabs, Pakistanis and Muslims in this article.

I'm removing all Yahoo groups reference and then, as there are BLP implications, removing every unreferenced statement.

Please discuss here before reinstating.

JASpencer (talk) 07:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keith-Smith v Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keith-Smith v Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Keith-Smith_v_Williams&oldid=1203235772"