Talk:Kely Support Group

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (283)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (998)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,346) • Stub-Class articles (6,690)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (404) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,260)

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 3 November 2006. Further details are available here.

Services of Kely[edit]

Are the services of Kely Support group supportive enough to meet the real needs of young people? Peer support, peer talk and competition between schools may be effective to some extenses, but bring about the question how far can it reach and affect? --0101angel06 15:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)0101angel06[reply]

About news[edit]

I think adding the part "news" is also relevant to this topic. Can someone please tell me why it is deleted. Thanks --0101anita06 05:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for advertisment. While it seems the topic Kely Support Group, there are concerns the article is being used to promote the institution. Thus, I would suggest not adding information that is not absolutely necessary in the article. -- ReyBrujo 05:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Events[edit]

Why so many different checkboxes since I didn't add them on the page when editing?

Copyright Infringement[edit]

Changing one or two words is also committing plagiarism.

Like the first paragraph on KELY Have a Hug Day and the part on Drug Education Programmes in local Chinese Schools . Please rewrite that and add in more information. I also got that pamphlet of KELY, but that's issued in 2002. And the most important of all, the pamphlet is copyrighted. Please read up more on avoiding plagiarism. 0101shirley06 11:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Match Magazine[edit]

Could the one who upload the part on Match Magazine rewrite that or consider removing that from the page? It's plagiarism again: http://www.kely.org/temp/kelyAR2005.pdf. 0101shirley06 08:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time to stop adding.[edit]

Is it time for us to stop adding new information since there is limited sources outside which we haven't found? Is it time for us to rearrange some of our information?

Yes I think it is. According to Hannah's email sent to all of us she said to stop adding new info and edit and rearrange from now on. So let's endeavor together to present an awesome KELY~ I've learnt a lot from all of you in the past several days esp. about the copyright issues. Sorry for not being able to contribute a lot more for the page, but I'm trying always. Thank you all~

I guess adding some more information about the public's view of KELY is necessary. Hannah also suggests that. So, i guess adding new information is still okay.0101shirley06 09:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess everyone got an email from Hannah about condensing the page. I just want to make a note that be careful when removing information from the page. Be critical and selective. Don't just try to remove things for the sake of removing. We cannot upload the information again if we found that somehing should not have been deleted. 0101shirley06 11:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's the final moments for us to edit the page. Try your best, everyone!--0101anita06 20:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images[edit]

To whom it may concern: the majority of the images in this article are tagged as fair use and require fair use rationales. If they are not added the images can be deleted in 7 days. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 20:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for everyone's comments. The page seems over-loaded with informatino that could be found in the organisation's webpage. I will be editing and cleaning up in the coming days. 0101hannah06 02:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kely logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Kely logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]