This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
The article Integral art was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 November 2013 with a consensus to merge the content into Ken Wilber. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.
Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.
An edit war is occurring as an editor is attempting to add promotional descriptions in the lede, calling the subject variously a scholar (subject has no degrees and does not teach at an accredited institution), a philosopher (subject is not known for any contributions to philosophy), or both. I do not know the subject, but I do know he is neither a scholar nor a philosopher. Ifnord (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Inclusion of "fan favorites" somewhere in the body?[edit]
There was a poll on IntegralWorld.net about which books are Wilber's best. Although the results of the poll shouldn't be featured in the lead section (because the opinions aren't professionally published ones), I think that it should be mentioned somewhere in the body of the article what the top picks were, in order to give other readers interested in Wilber a good idea of where to start with his large output. Do you agree? If not, why? AndrewOne (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is based on scholarly sources, not on fan's favorites. That's what fansites are for. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So nothing about the pseudo-scientific 'Q-link' that Wilber endorses (see: 'Norman Einstein ...')? And no mention of 'NORMAN EINSTEIN, The Dis-Integration of Ken Wilber', and 'Stripping the Gurus: Sex, Violence, Abuse and Enlightenment' by GEOFFREY D. FALK? YadaYadaYetMoreYada (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
