Talk:Kim Fox

Google

Hi just asking really.... I typed in this [1] and it only comes up with EE Characters 2009 and not her main article. Can we fix this or not? MayhemMario (talk) 10:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

No we can't fix Google lol but when I search it says "jump to Kim Fox" so people can go straight to her section, then they'll see the main article. Should have her article though. –anemoneprojectors– 11:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

i figured it out. If you type in Ian Beale it comes up with it straight away . But if you type in Kim Fox it dosent. Now if yuo type in Kimberely Harmony Angelica Fox it comes up wit it straight away! I think it dosent recongize it if you just type in Kim Fox. MayhemMario (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

You "figured it out"? Nobody will type that in. Try "kim fox eastenders". –anemoneprojectors– 10:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

yeah that works (so much easier.....) MayhemMario (talk) 10:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

LowCulture

Just so you know, LowCulture was deemed an unreliable source, so we probably shouldn't be using it. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_91#Lowculture. –anemoneprojectors– 12:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

oh. MayhemMario (talk) 10:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Let's Do Lunch...

Did anyone see Tameka on Let's Do Lunch yesterday? And did she say anything relevant? I would have watched it but had things to do :( –anemoneprojectors– 15:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

"Having a thick, sticky consistency between solid and liquid"?

Apparently the character is described (by somebody, I've added a {{by whom?}} tag) as "viscous and bubbly". I'm not sure "viscous" is the right word here; it means "Having a thick, sticky consistency between solid and liquid", which makes little or no sense. Good when describing a thick stew, daft when describing a person, even a fictional one. This needs editing to make sense ("viscous" in some figurative sense, perhaps, or was the intended word "vicious"?). The description needs a citation, in any event. I'll be removing this description if it's not cited and clarified in one week. Tonywalton ^Talk 00:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Clearly a typo. I've now corrected it. GSorby – Ping 19:32, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Not clearly a typo, though possibly. The original quote says "viscous". I always (since reading it years ago) took it to mean that she holds a grudge (things "stick" to her). Maybe the writer did mean "vicious" but how can we be sure? "Adhesive or sticky" "Having the properties of glue". None of these mean a person, but I also googled "viscous personality", and this word could possibly be used to describe a person if the writer didn't know the precise definition. Finally, I don't think Kim is vicious. (by the way, I reverted it before I saw this conversation, sorry. And it is cited (in the main text, not in the lead)) –anemoneprojectors– 13:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Sources

Award Nom. — M.Mario (T/C) 11:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

• Jane Reynolds Reception — M.Mario (T/C) 19:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

References

Date of birth?

I was just wondering if Kim's date of birth was ever mentioned. I know the page here says 27 May but how about the year? Was her age specifically mentioned on the 27 May? Just thinking about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinamckintyre23 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't believe it was because we'd have added a year if her age was mentioned. Kim's not the kind of person to reveal her actual age. But as 27 May isn't very far away, perhaps we'll find out this year. –anemoneprojectors– 07:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)