Talk:Kkwaenggwari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Etymology[edit]

What is the etymology of this word? Badagnani (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Korean Wikipedia, when a performer play the instrument, it sounds like "ggwaeng ggawaeng"(꽹꽹), so it was named as ggwaenggwari. Simple indeed.--Appletrees (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like the buk says "buk!" when you hit it? Badagnani (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Unless music terms had influenced by Chinese, the namings tend to follow to what people feel from instruments themselves. --Appletrees (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why?[edit]

why it doesn't have a defenition and how to make it . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.73.90 (talk) 13:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please change the title to Ggwaenggwari to standardize to the government's romanization (in effect since 2002 and used most widely on Wikipedia compared to the old MR romanization)?

I don't know how to do this, but it needs to be done. Umyang (talk) 09:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing[edit]

In regards to sourcing, all of the header seems to be ripped directly from Sound of Asia. Many other websites seem to also use this word by word - a warning for anyone seeking to cite this properly and maybe with alternate sources. XymphosCraK (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]