Talk:Kludenbach
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Kludenbach from de.wikipedia. |
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kludenbach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719052403/http://www.kirchberg-hunsrueck.de/wappenbeschreibung16.html to http://www.kirchberg-hunsrueck.de/wappenbeschreibung16.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Notability[edit]
Melcous It's good to see you are still ranging the world deciding what readers don't need to know. "No evidence of notability"? See the article on Horst Gehann in German Wikipedia. Or maybe you should delete that article too since it is unnecessary for readers to know about him. You seem to have an anti-reference librarian's perspective. More like a housekeeper who wants to rid the world of clutter. AnthroMimus (talk) 07:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yep, happy to admit I don't like clutter. (And the multitude of people adding names of non-notable people to various articles) If there is evidence of notability, then why not just link to it? Melcous (talk)
- So did you review the German Wikipedia article to test your belief of non-notability? Or is it that if you don'tr know something, no one needs to know it? Your students must be quite happy with you as a teacher. BTW, have you seen how many "Notable People" on Wikipedia don't have footnotes (mainly because they are notable I would think)? You have a big task ahead of you eliminating all of them. But then I guess that's what you do here. AnthroMimus (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)