Talk:Knowledge divide

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 January 2020 and 12 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oakinfe1. Peer reviewers: Khillm, Kikimakesedits.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old discussion[edit]

I would like to insert some facts that need future improvements: - More explanations about the core definition of knowledge divide - Examples and details about knowldge didive in gender, race.

Any further suggestions welcommed.

DorianS1 18:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! It seems like this article could use more specifics. For example, "scientists generally agree" is too broad and assumptive. Not all scientists globally agree with this theory. The sentence can be narrowed down to "American scientists Name Name discovered" - with a citation of their research and findings.mheart (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the article seems to be vague about what the knowledge divide is. Perhaps new sections regarding different parts of knowledge divide research and applications will clear it up.mheart (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lastly, a lot of sentences are written in the article without citation. I know sites like Google Scholar, Books, and your local library may help you with citing references, otherwise sentences without citation may be removed.mheart (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Student project (2011)[edit]

I'm currently working on an edit for this page that I hope will strengthen the definition of the Knowledge Divide and will expand on some of the key points, including how the Knowledge Divide relates to gender and education. I am also planning on adding some citations and carrying out some some grammatical and structural editing. Let me know if you have any objections or questions. Thanks! (Albertine1 (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Wikipedia supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]