Talk:Kodomo Teate Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:33, May 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Untitled[edit]

Kodomo teate law (子供手当て法) is not Child Allowance Law, because it is another law, Child Allowance Law indicate Jido teate (児童手当)　in English.Please study hard English and Japanese.I wrote it in User talk:DAJF#Kodomo teate law (子供手当て法) is not Child Allowance Law.--A Japanologist (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Off-topic and misleading section[edit]

I have tagged the "Objection for Kodomo Teate in the Diet" section as off-topic, as the exchange in the Diet was about the prime minister receiving money from his mother. The phrase "Kodomo Teate" was clearly used as humour, and this exchange has nothing to do with the Kodomo Teate Law as described in this article, and was certainly not an objection to the law. --DAJF (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement of Tamayo Marukawa‎ was public utterances in Diet discussion about Kodomo Teate law, and I deem it worthy to descrive.--A Japanologist (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that these "public utterances" were not actually about the Kodomo Teate Law and were not objecting to it either. The heading "Objection for Kodomo Teate in the Diet" in particular therefore looks inaccurate and outright misleading to me. --DAJF (talk) 09:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kodomo Teate Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]