Talk:Kontakt (software)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kontakt (software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Kompakt stub vs Kontakt article[edit]

This article is not notable, except in the context of Kontakt, which does not yet have its own article. I propose either re-naming and expanding this article, or moving/merging it with a new Kontakt article that I can draft. Not sure which course of action fits best within Wiki guidelines though, can other editors please weigh in? synthfiend (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Either method, merge and redirect or move, is fine. The issue is finding WP:RS sources. If you have some sources covering Kontakt, please go ahead and change the article's focus. Dialectric (talk) 17:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I began looking at this article due to its long-term notability query, and came to a similar conclusion, that Kompakt appears worthy of coverage here only in the context of Kontakt (sampler), which exists only as a redirect rather than an article. Synthfiend, if you think Kontakt can be demonstrated to be notable, one approach (seeking to preserve edit histories) might be (1) to add a section on Kontakt above Kompakt Program, then in quick succession (2) nominate the Kontakt (sampler) redirect for CSD G6 deletion; (3) reorient this article to be about Kontakt more than Kompakt; (4) rename the article to Kontakt (sampler). AllyD (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per AllyD suggestion I have added a Kontakt section above Kompakt Program. I am not, however, familiar with the process for nominating the Kontakt (sampler) redirect for CSD G6 deletion. I will gladly work on revising and expanding the article to be more about Kontakt.synthfiend (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kontakt is absolutely notable. It has an almost monopoly on Sampling based instruments, and its a monpoly that NI exploits ruthlessly. If you release sample based instruments, chances are its a release for Kontakt requiring the instrument maker to either license Kontakt, or require the user to obtain a license. It may well be the most important piece of software on the planet for composers and producers. Duckmonster (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article and updated accordingly. Feel free to expand it. synthfiend (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]