Talk:Kota Bharu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clarification on Muslim regulation to non-Muslims[edit]

Regarding the section Religion at the sentence "...the Islamic rule on proximity between males and females. However, these regulations apply for Muslims only." is there any citation for this? Recent news are about KB fining a non-Muslim hair dresser for cutting the opposite gender's hair, among other things. http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=56300

I'm not very well versed with editing the wikipedia page or if it should be, so can someone take a look at this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.139.87.208 (talk) 14:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questions[edit]

I have some questions:

(1) Are there indeed many wats in Kota Bharu proper? I thought the wats were outside the city, in the direction of Tumpat.

(2) Is it indeed the case that the Japanese landed at Kota Bharu? I thought they landed at Tumpat.

Michael 08:31 06 July 2005 (UTC)

I believe the correct spelling should be Kota Bahru, although there are numerous variants in common use.

David 30 December 2005

The official spelling is Kota Bharu, for whatever reason. This is also reflected in the Jawi spelling. See the Malay version for confirmation. Groogle (talk) 05:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

japanese army landing[edit]

I've deleted two sentences regarding the landing of Japanese Army which have not been referenced. I think they should be referenced because there are many views regarding the actual location. Wai Hong 04:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifications[edit]

I am a dweller in Kota Bharu for 19 years since I was born. Hence, I have plausible and credible evidence to support the following statements I would make:

1. Most of the wats are indeed in Tumpat, not Kota Bharu
2. The Japanese Army landed on Pantai Cahaya Bulan, a beach which faces South China Sea, in Kota Bharu
3. The correct name is truly Kota Bharu, it is so in the mailing addresses

Prince V 15:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't dispute the name. Maybe you can cite a source for the Japanese landing as original research is not allowed in Wikipedia. I don't mind if you change the sentence about wats in Tumpat.Wai Hong 15:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese Army landed on Pantai Cinta Berahi, which is known as Pantai Cahaya Bulan for the time being (Malaysian Army 2006). Here is the link to the related article on the official website of Malaysian Army, but it is in Malay: [1]

Prince V 16:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese landing[edit]

In his book "The Japanese Invasion of Kelantan in 1941", published by Perbadanan Muzium Negeri Kelantan in 1991, reprinted 1994, author Mike Wrigglesworth states that they landed at Pantai Sabak, shortly after midnight local time on 8 December 1941, and backs up the claim with a map. This agrees with what all local people have told me. The Pantai Chinta Berahi (later Pantai Cahaya Bulan) does not seem to have been involved, though it appears that a Pantai Badang (if I can read the handwritten map), between the other two beaches, was also involved.

The reference to a page on the Malaysian Armed Forces web site no longer resolves. Groogle (talk) 05:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kota Lama[edit]

Kota Lama is the name of the old palace (Istana Kota Lama) on the Kelantan river, not far from the centre of Kota Bharu. I've never heard of a Kota Lama at Pantai Sabak, and the Malay Wikipedia doesn't mention it either. The reference in the page also doesn't mention it, so I suppose they fixed their page. I've fixed this one. Groogle (talk) 05:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Separate[edit]

I recommend separating the District (Jajahan) from the city, and making two separate articles. It would lead to less confusion and make finding specific information easier. --Bejnar (talk) 19:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kota Bharu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2022[edit]

In the History Section paragraph 2 the word “engaged” should be “engage.” 108.6.133.233 (talk) 13:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Happy Editing--IAmChaos 14:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing aleef in Jawi script name.[edit]

The Jawi for Kota Bharu should be کوتا بهارو , same as Malay wiki. Kazuki278 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]