Talk:Kucha

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kucha article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Kucha is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

International Dunhuang Project

This article was created or expanded as part of the International Dunhuang Project editing program for articles on Silk Road and Central Asian archaeology.International Dunhuang ProjectWikipedia:GLAM/British Library/IDPTemplate:WikiProject IDPInternational Dunhuang Project articles

Removed references to supposed Turkic origin of name[edit]

I have removed references to supposed Turkic origin of the name Kucha as it was called by similar names for many centuries before Turkic languages are known to have arrived in the region. John Hill 02:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Related to Kushan Empire?[edit]

Is Kucha related to the Kushan Empire? Badagnani 01:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section on 'other words that are something like "Kuch(a)" or whatever' does not belong in this article.[edit]

The section on 'other words that are something like "Kuch(a)" or whatever' does not belong in this article. I have deleted it. If it belongs anywhere it could be put on a disambiguation page, which I don't know how to do.Chris B (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the "Modern" Section[edit]

How can they be armed with Lee-Enfield rifles (old ones at that) if the Lee-Enfield rifle hadn't even been introduced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.188.91.60 (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]