Talk:L.D.U. Quito

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Carlos Espinola's nationality[edit]

Shouldn't Espínola be listed as Paraguayan? He holds Ecuadorian citizenship now, but in the past he did play for Paraguay, so he's still Paraguayan according to FIFA. If I'm not mistaken... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Libertariandude (talk • contribs) 06:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the sub-section historical matches[edit]

Because it was added to be modifyied in the future, I mean, this is the way Wikipedia is being constructed.

-VH1982 (talk) 22:37, 29 November 2009 (GMT - 03:00)

If there is going to be a historical matches section, it would have to feature matches that are historical to our history, not merely records. That 7-0 win or the 0-6 loss are not historical in the large history we have in South American tournaments. Those two don't even come close. Digirami (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was the worst defeat in YOUR history in an international tornament, so, it has its own merit to be included. By the way, I remember you that you haven't played to many tournaments like Boca Juniors, Peñarol, Nacional or Independiente, (not even won as many as they) VH1982 (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.73.129.149 (talk) [reply]
And, furthermore, this section was included in order to add more matches, in the way that wikipedia is being constructed (as you were told before, and you seem to ignore), you can stand a point if you choose what to answer and what not VH1982 (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.73.129.149 (talk) [reply]
There are bigger things in the works. The problem, especially with teams Liga since they have been in the international scene longer, is determining what is historic, and more importantly, how to limit it before the section gets too big. Given that Liga has been in 21 international tournaments (and increasingly more as time goes on), when to draw the line, or when to stop before it gets too big can get problematic. That's why bigger clubs with a longer history in international tournaments do not have a historic match section. Now if you really want to be helpful to a project I have lined up for Liga's page, find me Liga's biggest win in the Copa Libertadores and/or their largest league loss. Digirami (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you want me to find the largest win of Liga in an international tournament, so, why don't you agree to put the fact of the largest loss in the article, specially after you have done the same in River Plate's article. Furthermore, you haven't put any reference to River's largest defeat in domestic league, why do you ask me to do the same?, come on, your team was nothing until last year, your participations were negligable. I can understand that the adding of the worst defeat in an international tournament would be embarrasing for you (as a fan of Liga), but, as you have said in River Plate's article, "that's a part of the history" --190.135.55.202 (talk) 22:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps Liga is something in Ecuador, but it's nothing in south america, remember, Argentinos Juniors has won Copa Libertadores once, and then they never obtained an international tournament again. That's the same for Colo Colo in Chile, come on, not even Velez is considered a "big team" and they achieved the Intercontiental Cup in 1994 (that's todays equivalent of Clubs World Cup). So the "fact" that Liga is a big team in South America is false, at least by the moment --190.135.55.202 (talk) 22:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm working on a page that will have a bunch of Liga statistics and records. So, hold off on that section. Digirami (talk) 22:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I have already done it, at least I have found the worst lost. I mean, that was the worst defeat in Libertadores Cup (and in all international tournaments as well, since there is no other defeat registered in Copa Merconorte nor in Copa CONMEBOL, and Liga never played Supercopa, because its participations in international tournaments until the last year were negligable). --190.135.55.202 (talk) 22:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copa Libertadores semifinalist in 1974 and 1975. Copa Sudamericana semifinalist in 2004. Winner of the Libertadores in 2008. Winner of the Recopa in 2009. Quite possibly the winner of the Sudamericana in 2009. In the overall statistics of the Libertadores, we 23 of 179 clubs. In overall statistics (that means excluding trophies), we rank hgher than Flamengo, Internacional, Vasco da Gama, Estudiantes de La Plata, Velez Sarsfield, Argentinos Juniors, Racing, Once Caldas, and Santos. All of those are big clubs who have won the competition. Let's not forget big clubs who have not won the trophy: Corinthians, America de Cali, Bolivar, Cerro Porteno, Universidad Catolica, Barcelona, Deportivo Cali, Emelec, San Lorenzo, U de Chile, Millonarios, Alianza Lima, Caracas, Independiente Medellin, Deportivo Cali, Universitario de Deportes... You see? Historically and now, Liga is a big club on the continent. Accept it. Digirami (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
God, biggest than Estudiantes and Racing without winning a trophy against any european club? alright, Liga's performance is not bad, but you have to accept that is the same phenomena as Colo Colo in 1991, I mean, ONE OR TWO TROPHIES AND THEN GOODBYE, ok, it's not bad at all, but it's not enough to be considered a big team, don't rely on what TV says, sometimes it lies! (sometimes, and always)... please, don't make me laugh, perhaps, whene you achieve 5 Libertadores, 3 World Cups, or something like that you would be able to talk... Boca Juniors is big, Independiente, Sao Paulo FC, Olimpia, Nacional, (of course, they don't need the help of playing at 2800 mts over the sea-level) and is a matter of time Corinthians get the level with your team (or San Lorenzo, or any other truly big team). Come on! you cannot be serious when including Bolivar among south american big teams XD... By the way, I know what's wrong with you, Ecuador HAS NEVER WON ANYTHING, and of course, there is ONE ONLY TEAM that has won SOMETHING, at least two or three cups, buddy... Velez is bigger than Liga, and Flamengo as well (they were both world champions, something hardly impossible for an ecuatorian team). I know, my team is not a big one, but at least I recognize it. Regards!

PD: I almost forget it, India has not win anything either, and I'm sure that even my team could beat your national team XD... please turn your mind towards cricket (just kidding) --190.135.85.165 (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you don't know much about history or statistics. The historical table of the Copa Libertadores. Highlights: Liga is ranked 21; Bolivar 9; Independiente 14; River Plate de Montevideo... Oh wait, they've never participated in the competition. I guess thats why your team's article has a Historic Match section: to give the readers and fans a false sense that RIver Plate de Montevideo has some history in South American club football, when in reality, they don't have one. I mean hell, even if ranked by tournament wins first we are still ranked in the top 20. Now if we look at the overall cup count, Liga ranks 21 (but realistically, we will jump places since the odds of us not winning the Sudamericana are slim to nil). In addition, when we do win the Sudamericana, we would be qualified to another two international trophies next: the Recopa, and the Copa Suruga Bank. And don't bring altitude into this: we win and loss to teams at home or on the road. Velez didn't beat us in their own ground this year. Plus, Colo-Colo is a big club. To not consider them as one is ludicrous (shows what little knowledge you have).
Winning against a European club has nothing to do with this either. Estudiantes, in its hayday, could only win 1 of 3 intercontinental cup they qualified for; Independiente, in their impressive 4 Libertadores run, won it 1 in 4 times. So far as I know, Liga has played only two European clubs (both within the past year): Manchester United and Real Madrid, two of the highest spending and most talented clubs in the world in the past year. Digirami (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I disagree, I do know something about soccer history, not only teams, but about players and tournaments as well. By the way, "Suruga whatever", oh!, that's excellent, what a big cup. The fact that River Plate Montevideo has not played any international tournament is true, but, on the other hand we have reached Copa Sudamericana's semifinal. I mean, we deserve to have played at least three Libertadores, but, regretably we have been lost out several times in the domestic league by lots of things not realted to soccer itself. And, please, do you really consider a "serious" static that one, which includes Bolivar as the 9th team in South America?, don't you think this was made in order to get bolivian people's attention?, god, if history were really taken in count then Bolivar would have not get not even in 30 best teams in South American history, think about it. --164.73.129.73 (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And, of course, Ecuador is nothing in world soccer history, but Uruguay... you know, don't you? ;). --164.73.129.73 (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently you can't read either cause River de Montevideo hasn't been in a Libertadores. Ever! (Suruga is a new cup. The first edition was last year). And yes, those are serious statistics prepared by CONMEBOL themselves.
Uruguay is no longer the powerhouse they was were. In the 2000's Ecuador has qualified to as many World Cups as you have and we've done better too.
Arguing with you is like arguing to a brick wall. This conversation is over because this is not a place to talk about the team or football in general. My team is better than yours, and we are now a big team on the continent. Any further attempts to continue this conversation will be met with reprimand. Digirami (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hahaha!, please, I know you have lost this discussion, please don't be angry and take it easy --164.73.129.73 (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! there would be some "reprimand"!!, I'm trembling... accept it, you don't know how does it feel to be among the only seven teams that had win the World Cup. And we did it twice!!!, by the way, Ecuador will never win it, and you know that. Liga is nothing, like the rest of the teams in your country. And the fact that your team is better than mine is moot, due to River defeated Liga playing at NORMAL CONDITIONS, and you know, it could (and it should) be worst. Please, start practicing cricket, India is very good at that sport (the only one). Oh, I have forgotten something: WE ARE QUALYFIED TO 2010 WORLD CUP, and your country has been eliminated... regards ;) (not) --164.73.129.73 (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change Log 04/07/2006[edit]

  • Removed stub on this page as info is comprehensive.
  • Removed College Soccer category

Supersean 05:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was little participation but no opposition and does not appear improper.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Liga Deportiva Universitaria (Quito) → Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito — "de Quito" is part of the team's name, is always mentioned with "de Quito" or "Quito" in the majority of acronyms of the team's name; it should be part of the title. I tried to do the move myself, but it cannot be done for some reason. — Digirami (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Attention![edit]

A todos los que trabajan editando esta pagina en wikipedia tengan cuidado y revisen constantemente de vandalos hinchas de equipos rivales que escriben el mensage "La Caca Blanca". Si encuentran mensages asi favor borrarlos de immediato. To everyone that edits and works on this article on wikipedia I ask of you to please review more carefully and constantly the disrespectful vandalism from a follower of a rival team which vandalizes the page with the following message "La Caca Blanca" or "The white shit" and if you happen to find such message delete it immediately. Gracias -Thank you- Justinian43 (talk) 18:21, December 13 2009 (UTC)

The Club's Official Date of Foundation[edit]

The club's official website (www.ldu.com.ec) serves as a verifiable source indicating the date of foundation as the 12 of January, 1930. This webpage can be found at http://www.ldu.com.ec/home/contenidos.php?id=45&identificaArticulo=19

The club further cites El Libro Blanco de la Liga by Patricio Falconi Almeida. The author is an Ecuadorian writer, satirist and poet. A Google Books search on the author's works includes topics on sports, politics, sociology, and poetry- including three books about Liga. The author appears credible and has merited the club's qualifications as an expert in Liga's history as is evidenced in the club citing his work in its official website's section on the Club's History.

A comment by J. Checa on the webpage of the club's history contends the founding date as the 11th of January and cites a copy of a document in his possession indicating the date of foundation signed by the club's founding officials. This document apparently has yet to be revealed, if not, why not cite it?

FIFA.com has a Classic Futbol entry on Liga also indicating the 11th of January. This appears to be self-referential in that the authors of that article may have cited Wikipedia or vice versa. Either way we should have a verifiable source cited, but there is none.

It is credible that the founders of Liga met on January 11, 1930 on a Saturday evening. However with a little deliberation and speculation it is conceivable that the meeting went past midnight as is common between gentlemen of such distinguishing qualities involved in such a fine discourse. Therefore it seems wise and prudent to say that the club was indeed officially found on that early Sunday morning, the 12th of January 1930. Not only does it seem very practical, but perhaps the founders chose glorious Sunday purposefully. ElectricMind (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, here is the official document send by the principal of the Universidad Central del Ecuador on january 13 of 1930. It's in spanish so you can translate it.

" Dr. Aurelio Mosquera N.

RECTOR UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL ECUADOR

Señor Bolívar León, Director de Liga Deportiva Universitaria.

Me es honroso llevar a conocimiento de Ud. que la Junta General de Estudiantes aficionados al deporte, previamente convocados por el Señor Rector de la Universidad Central del Ecuador y presididos por él, en sesión del 11 de los corrientes, con el fin de constituir Liga Deportiva Universitaria, nombró un Director Provisional, del que Usted forma parte como Director de Liga Deportiva Universitaria. Al comunicar la acertada elección recaída en su persona, sírvase aceptar mi felicitación sincera y los votos que hago porque la naciente entidad corone con éxito sus fines.

De usted atentamente,

Dr. A. Mosquera N., Director de la Junta"

You can find this information in the book of Leonel Montoya, historic coach of LDU in the national titles of 1974 and 1975, the book's name is "De la Universidad a la cancha, LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA UNA PASION ESTUDIANTIL". The ISBN number is 978-9978-369-09-8.

Unfortunately there are some informations in ldu.com.ec that are wrong or outdated. Another example is the opening of LDU's Country Club, in the webpage says it was open in the 80's, and actually it was opened in 1977.

You can find this information in the book of Jorge Ribadeneira former basketball player of LDU, the book's name is "Liga y el Negro Paz". The ISBN number is 978-9942-02-074-1. --Paulce1527 (talk) 16:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OFFICIAL NAME : Liga Deportiva Universitaria (LDU)[edit]

El 11 de enero de 1930, se reunieron estudiantes de la universidad y deportistas del equipo "Universitario", convocados por el entonces presidente del club Dr. Bolívar León y presididos por el Rector de la universidad el Dr. Aurelio Mosquera Narváez para dar inicio a una historia de triunfos con la fundación del club que sería llamado jurídicamente con el nombre Oficial de "Liga Deportiva Universitaria". En esos días LDU contaba con varias disciplinas deportivas entre las que podemos mencionar: fútbol, baloncesto, atletismo, natación, tenis, andinismo, ciclismo y ajedrez.

The January 11, 1930, met college students and athletes of the team "University", convened by the then club president Dr. Bolívar León and chaired by the Chancellor of the University Dr. Aurelio Mosquera Narvaez to begin a history of successes with the founding of the club that would be called legally Officer named "Liga Deportiva Universitaria". In those days LDU had several sports, among which we can mention: football, basketball, athletics, swimming, tennis, climbing, cycling and chess. 


El Inicio

Todo presente tiene su historia, un comienzo, siempre será importante regresar en el tiempo, para entender nuestro presente y mirar el futuro con optimismo y ambición; cada hincha posee su propia historia, su versión de los hechos, sus datos y estadísticas.

Este largo camino inicia en la muy ilustre Universidad Central del Ecuador, en el año 1918, bajo la dirección del Dr. César Jácome Moscoso, ahí nace el equipo “Universitario” denominado también como el equipo “de los doctorcitos”, la idea de crear un club de fútbol nació para satisfacer las necesidades de los estudiantes universitarios de aquel entonces.

El equipo fue creciendo y la idea fue tomando forma, un 11 de enero de 1930 nace el equipo de LIGA y se oficializó jurídicamente con el nombre de LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA el 12 de Enero de 1930 bajo la presidencia del Dr. Bolívar León.

El 1 de febrero de 1930, días después de su oficialización, el Dr. Aurelio Mosquera Narváez asignó al Dr. Bolívar León la cantidad de 500 sucres para que LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA pueda desarrollarse en sus actividades deportivas. Eran tiempos distintos a los actuales, el fútbol empezaba a ganarse un espacio importante en la afición ecuatoriana.


The Home

All this has a story, a beginning, it is always important to go back in time, to understand our present and look to the future with optimism and ambition, every fan has their own story, their version of the facts, data, and statistics.

This long road begins in the very illustrious Central University of Ecuador, in 1918, under the direction of Dr. Cesar Jacome Moscoso, there arises the team "University" also referred to as the team "of Doctorcitos", the idea of ​​creating a football club was created to meet the needs of college students back then.

The team grew and the idea took shape a January 11, 1930 born LEAGUE team and made ​​official by the name legally LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA on January 12, 1930 under the chairmanship of Dr. Bolívar León.

On February 1, 1930, days after its official, Dr. Aurelio Mosquera Narvaez Dr. Bolívar León assigned to the amount of 500 sucres for LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA can develop in your sport. Times were different from the present, football was gaining an important place in the Ecuadorian hobby. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.131.79.253 (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FEF says it's "Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito." FIFA says it's "Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito." It may have been founded as "Liga Deportiva Universitaria", but it's Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito now, plain and simple. Digirami (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree that the title of the institution is "Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito", per WP:COMMONNAME the page should probably be moved to the title of "LDU Quito". Regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 20:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The common name in Ecuadorean sources appears to be Liga de Quito (LDUQ is used less frequently). See how often El Diario uses Liga de Quito. Also, we need some disambiguation because their is a club in Loja (commonly called Liga de Loja) with an almost identical name. Jogurney (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The name "Liga de Quito" is too ambiguous to serve as a title. LDU Quito is the common name in sports books and journals.--MarshalN20 | Talk 22:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move: LDU Quito[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito → LDU Quito – Common name. It has 1,700 GoogleBook hits (see [1]) versus the 758 hits for the current longer name (see [2]). A web search has overwhelmingly similar results, with 2,640,000 hits for LDU Quito (see [3]) versus the 1,400,000 hits for the current name (see [4]. Relisted. BDD (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC) MarshalN20 | Talk 12:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While I am a bit reluctant, I would not be against the move. However if the common name of the club is to be used as the article name, I think Liga de Quito is more used in common vernacular. Additionally, any discussion to move this page would have to included the other similarly named clubs. Digirami (talk) 18:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page protection[edit]

I have fully protected the page until such time as the name issue is sorted, see the RM above. GiantSnowman 08:33, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error with name of LIGA[edit]

There is an error with the name of LIGA. LDU was founded on January 11, 1930 with the official name of LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA from other teams then copied the name of LIGA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.5.36.73 (talk • contribs)

I would think that the apparent name conflict would be for LDU Quito or the courts to decide. If and when they change their name, the name could be changed on Wikipedia pages. It is not for Wikipedia to enforce. Until then, it should remain their common name: "LDU Quito". Jim1138 (talk) 00:37, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All this has a story, a beginning, it is always important to go back in time, to understand our present and look to the future with optimism.

LIGA birth of a January 11, 1930 and made ​​official by the name legally LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA on January 12, 1930 under the chairmanship of Dr. Bolívar León. For this reason "Quito" is not part of the name of LIGA.

LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA has patented its name since 1930 in and out of Ecuador, is the only worldwide LDU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.130.168.55 (talk) 03:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SINCE 1930: LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA. (LDU - LIGA)[edit]

LIGA The official name is "LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA.". LIGA ONE BORN JANUARY 11, 1930. LIGA NAME AND ACRONYMS LDU REGISTERED BY THIS IEPI (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY) INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LEVEL. WIKIPEDIA MUST VERIFY THE LIGA HISTORY WITH FOUNTAIN http://www.ldu.com.ec/portal/index. VANDALISM IS CONFUSE PEOPLE AND NO OTHER NAMES HAVE INFORMAL KNOWLEDGE LIGA HISTORY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.130.168.55 (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LIGA Deportiva Universitaria / LDU / LIGA[edit]

LIGA official Site: http://www.ldu.com.ec/portal/index

The best historical source is on the club's official website: http://www.ldu.com.ec/portal/index

The team grew and the idea took shape a January 11, 1930 born LDU team and made ​​official by the name legally LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA on January 12, 1930 under the chairmanship of Dr. Bolívar León.

On February 1, 1930 , days after its official , Dr. Aurelio Mosquera Narvaez Dr. Bolívar León assigned to the amount of 500 sucres for LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA can develop in your sport. Times were different from the present , football was gaining an important place in the Ecuadorian hobby .

As mencianos above, at the time the football team was made up of Central University students and each took care of himself , uniforms, bandages , ointments and other , Dr. Bolívar León for example, was Technical Director player and was also responsible for designing the uniform , it would be he who designed the first LIGA uniform , white shirt with a red U in the chest in a blue triangle and red background .

The students finished their classes and headed to the stadium of El Ejido with shovels and picks to build the arches and thus to play football and "train" .

At the LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA team in 1930, played the likes of Carlos Andrade Marín , Enrique Mosquera , Alfonso Cevallos , Alfonso Troya , " El Mono " Icaza , among others.

In 1932 LDU gets his first title after becoming champion of the League Amateur de Pichincha , had been only two years of its founding.

The first category of football capital in that year , had five teams : Gladiator , Gymnastic , LDU , Atlétic and Cleveland , LDU had won all four matches and only her face was the Gladiator in the last game .

The final will be the played a June 19, 1932 at Municipal Stadium "El Ejido " and LIGA football was crowned champion after defeating Pichincha by 4 goals to 0 the set of Gladiator . The goals of this meeting were scored Bolivar Leon ( 1) Alejandro Davalos (2) and Humberto Yanez ( 1).

During the following years , LIGA was growing step by step, creating good foundation for the future , the Amateur Championship title Pichicha not repeated , however , the following year , LDU began to create his own identity and to earn football sheet " The Embroiderer " for his good play, exquisite touch and plays ...

http://www.ldu.com.ec/portal/contenido/ver/120

Please LIGA name is patented nationally (IEPI) and internationally. Please ask that the name be reviewed considering the history of LDU using official sources such as the website of the institution. The official compleot legal name since 1930 is "LIGA DEPORTIVA UNIVERSITARIA". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.130.168.55 (talk) 02:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA: Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito
FEF: Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito
The major third party sources says it is Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito. All your source proves is that the club was founded as just Liga Deportiva Universitaria. Club names change. If we were to follow the official website, the name of the club would be Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Ecuador, which it is not. Digirami (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on L.D.U. Quito. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on L.D.U. Quito. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LDU Quito became a sports club[edit]

LDU Quito has funded a Women Cyclist Teams and will compete in the womens Ecuador's Cycling tour and also got Jonathan Caicedo giro ditalias winner to play for LDU Quito's new cycling division and will make a mens and womens team to be in the "Vuelta de Ecuaor" — Preceding unsigned comment added by EcuadorianEditor827 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:L.D.U._Quito&oldid=1203433181"