Talk:Ladislav Ščurko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:LadislavScurko.jpg[edit]

Image:LadislavScurko.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Center/Centre[edit]

1) Canadian players should use Centre/Defenceman
2) American players should use Center/Defenseman
3) All others, if a conflict should arise, should revert back to precedent.
That how I thought it was on Wikipedia (for ice hockey articles, anyway). He was a Philadelphia Flyers draft pick and prospect and, last time I checked, Seattle and Tri-City aren't in BrE countries. --scottieISmad (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No but the WHL is primarily based in Canada, though that is a weak argument. But he is a Slovak player who played his entire professional career in Slovakia, Slovakia like all other European nations uses BrE. WP:ENGVAR clearly states that "An article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation uses the appropriate variety of English for that nation". Since we are talking about just one word in a stub this discussion is a little silly, but considering that it might be expanded with the recent development it is a good idea to define which variety the article should use. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 04:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Slovakia like all other European nations uses BrE." I've heard this before, but I don't know for a fact that it is true. Are there any non-English speaking countries that use the American variant? And why exactly would it matter which variant of English a non-English speaking country would use? Why should it determine which variant is used in a Wikipedia article such as this one? --scottieISmad (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In all of Europe British English is considered the standard. Due to reasons such as the lack of language skills other variants are anyhow fairly common as well. I find it proper to use British English in articles like this, maybe there is a need for a separate American Wikipedia? -93.210.247.204 (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"In all of Europe British English is considered the standard." I would like to see some sort of reference for this. Why would the likes of France, Germany, and Slovakia have a set standard for a particular foreign language which prefers one variant over other variants? I've read articles on AmE, BrE, and general English and none make the assertion that BrE is the preferred variant in certain non-English speaking European countries. --scottieISmad (talk) 17:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well in Europe students all are taught British English just because its the country where the language comes from and because the British culture is more similar to the culture of the rest of Europe than yours in the States. I guess you will learn American Englis in South American and Mexico. ;-) --Vicente2782 (talk) 22:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladislav Ščurko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ladislav_Ščurko&oldid=1204082490"