Talk:Lancia/Archives/2017

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"No longer sold outside Italy"?

If that's true, why does Lancia have separate web sites for a dozen countries? Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Sale to Agnelli

The article reads:

Fiat launched a take-over bid in October 1969 which was accepted by Lancia as the company was losing significant sums of money, with losses in 1969 being GB£20m.

The thing was not exactly so: Pesenti had to resist a corporate raid launched by Michele Sindona and his English partner Hambros Bank: in fact, Sindona and Hambros wanted to put their hand on Italcementi and consequently on Pesenti Family's strongbox, which contained a couple of banks and the RAS insurance. With the help of the political power of that time Pesenti managed to avoid losing Italcementi but had to pay 50 billion Lire cash and give away some assets, included Lancia, which Agnelli bought at the symbolic price of 1 Lira per share. (see Turani, Giuseppe. "Padroni senza cuore", Milan:Rizzoli, 1980, pagg. 82-90). -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 22:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lancia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)