Talk:Lancia Lybra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not only were the taillights used on the facelifted Marea, the front turn indicators were used on the facelifted 2003 Fiat barchetta aswell.

A Chinese company is about to revive the Lybra: [1] According to this article, the floorplan wasn't based on the Bravo, but on the Alfa 156. Also it's said that production has ceased early 2006. More on the Lybra's passive rearwheel steering here: [2] --82.176.160.13 06:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance[edit]

There should be a paragraph in the article about the model's sales performance and wether it was a success or a flop. It would probably also be worth mentioning that the Lybra's commercial launch was delayed for more than a year because of the negative reaction of Italian Lancia Dealerships when the car was presented to them. They even asked Lancia to keep producing Dedras for at least two more years. This was extensively reported by specialised media at the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Southwestsoul (talkcontribs) 13:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lancia Lybra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]