Talk:Lancia Megagamma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Nice to see this article's been created. I suspect a fair use image might be OK here, since it's a 30 year old concept car and is unlikely to show up in public these days (unless there's one on display in a Fiat museum somewhere). I've used FU images for a lot of Mitsubishi Motors' concept cars from the '80s and '90s, and they've been assessed as acceptable.

I would change one sentence though: "The car never reached production phase because it was seen too risky and low selling model by Umberto Agnelli." This gives no context to who Agnelli is, and nor does his WP page. Was he boss of Lancia at the time? Did he have a formally influential position at Fiat (his NYT obit suggests not)? The cited reference suggests he merely lamented others' lack of courage which would scuttle the car's hope of mass production, but reading our article you might think he made the decision personally. -DeLarge (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, I made some changes--— Typ932T | C  10:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lancia Megagamma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]