Talk:Landfill/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 18:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail. Article needs major works (Just putting some ideas here before it gets lost in the queue

Some general issues:

article has a lot of maintence tags on
Lots of CN needed
Operations is completely uncited
Article uses quotations without arbritration
Lots of tiny sections
20 refs for a topic this huge isn't much.
Boldavoid in the lede
Lede needs improvement.

Didn't want to go into too much depth, but this isn't suitable without improvement for GAN.

P.S - just checked, article was drive-by nominated. Not a contributer. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I was also about to Immediate fail this per WP:GAFAIL. I would like to add: the article has several issues that do not merit a hold, including additional reference tags and worldwide view issues. The article fails the basic six WP:Good article criteria, which I suggest the nominee review and perhaps seek a WP:Peer review instead before nominating for GA again. The article should also be close to passing GA by the nomination stage, not be totally overhauled while it is in this stage. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 18:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]