Talk:Landmark Pinnacle
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Tower height[edit]
The planned height of City Pride is usually given as 239m in all of the news items and other articles I have read on this topic. However, I don't think that is actual height of the building. If you look at the planning documents on the Tower Hamlets website (North Elevation for example), the measurement is actually 239m A.O.D. which I understand would refer to the spot height above sea level. The ground floor is given as 5.80 A.O.D. Therefore I would suggest the height of the building is the difference - i.e. 233.2m - which is the height I've put in the article details (rounded to 233m). I'm not in the construction trade, so maybe I've got that wrong, but it seems to make sense to me. Seaweed (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Landmark Pinnacle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20131104101333/http://www.wharf.co.uk/2012/03/isle-of-dogs-pub-city-pride-pr.html to http://www.wharf.co.uk/2012/03/isle-of-dogs-pub-city-pride-pr.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)