Talk:Larry Schweikart

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Larry Schweikart article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Iraq war[edit]

The war in Iraq isn't over -- it's premature to say that it has been won. Risssa (talk) 06:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

professor level[edit]

Does anybody know what level of professor this guy is -- assistant, associate, full? That should be included. Also, does he actually teach in the history program at the the University of Dayton and if so, what types of courses? Like most of this article, the section on his professional life is vague and poorly written.Risssa (talk) 06:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Class costumes[edit]

hey comes into class sometimes in costume. He makes up raps and songs about historical topics were are covering in class. It is more of an embarassment and awkward than helpful. Maybe it would be fun if we were a elementary school class, but it doesnt work at this level. Should this article say something about how he sings and dances to 'historical songs' of his own creation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.83.247 (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page Nuked[edit]

I deleted the whole page. There were no citations in the page. For any article this should be a no-no, and especially for a living person where libel could be a real possiblity. Suggest that if someone wants to revert my edit they take the time to find and add sources, if not I would caution against reverting any of the material in the page, but most of all the phone interview and rock band stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I5kfun (talk • contribs) 04:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP says "Remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced". I've bolded the word that you may have missed. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you forgot to read the whole thing. "Biographical material about a living individual that is not compliant with this policy should be improved and rectified; if this is not possible, then it should be removed. If the entire page is substantially of poor quality, containing primarily unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons, then it may be necessary to delete the entire page as an initial step, followed by discussion." I seem to have followed those guidelines precisely. I bolded the words you might have missed. I5kfun (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Give me a break[edit]

The paragraph about his bad grades and steppenwolf, give me a break, it this a hit job or what? 74.215.255.82 (talk) 05:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I found it amusing and admirable that he went back... it does need some sources, though. --Matthew K (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.patriotshistoryusa.com/author-bios/ He did indeed have bad grades. He also opened for "Steppenwolf." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.206.41 (talk) 21:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems unbalanced[edit]

Right now, this page seems like it's a promo for Schweikart. And it's sourcing Conservapedia. Seems pretty unbalanced right now. I don't know anything about the guy, so I can't fix it. Thanks.Masternachos (talk) 04:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a promo[edit]

I'm deleting the bit about "liberal-left" textbooks and his book being "the" alternative of choice, until it can be substantiated. That's a minor change compared to what's needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fbaerkir (talk • contribs) 01:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional marginal source[edit]

The University of Dayton's College of Arts and Sciences has this page which in general confirms the content of this page. There is also this far-from-updated history department page. Probably not the best sources, but they have some value. -Matthew K (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

article bias[edit]

this article is extremely one sided.. this needs to be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.33.195 (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Post-academic career?[edit]

There's no existing 'criticism' section. Might a story about Schweikart as a source of misinformation like this [1] be notable? Also bio mentions later work as film producer of 'Rockin’ the Wall'. --Cedders^tk 11:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Misinformation[edit]

Should be flagged as a source for misinformation.

Larry Schweikart, the article’s subject is an “election denier” and was the source for misinformation about illegal immigrants being ”bussed” to vote illegally for Beto O’Rourke (a progressive Texas Democrat) by O’Rourke’s campaign.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/conservative-larry-schweikart-false-claim-beto-illegals

The ‘lede’ paragraph seeks to give an air of legitimacy to Schweikart as a scholar, but fails to mention that his most recent notoriety is as political subversive and further fails to mention that much of Schweikart’s most recent output are not scholarly works but are rather works of popular history which represent controversial and/or fringe opinions. Bthlaw (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are an idiot. 173.25.14.15 (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]