Talk:Laurus Labs

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What Talk is not for[edit]

Talk is not for the insertion of content that does not belong in the article. If editors believe there should be an article about Dr. Chava, then create and submit a draft. David notMD (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PR tag[edit]

Prolix, could you explain the PR tag? The content (except for one sentence recently added by a new editor that has been tagged with "citation needed") is factual, neutral and backed by independent, reliable and secondary sources. Here are WP:THREE sources to prove notability: [1] [2] [3]. If you still have "questions" about its notability, please start an AFD. M4DU7 (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that you created Divi's Laboratories article. Most of the sources used on that article are company profiles/shareholding patterns/financial reports, which definitely fit the description of routine coverage. So I'm not entirely sure if you have a firm grasp on guidelines like SIGCOV and CORPDEPTH. M4DU7 (talk) 08:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Scientist at Laurus Labs R&D.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]