Talk:Leisure sickness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linkback Issue[edit]

Paradise Syndrome links back to this article, which then compares Leisure Sickness *TO* Paradise Syndrome. Something cannot be similar-to-but-different-than something else and still by synonymous enough for one to link directly to the other. Thus I have removed the linkback and blanked the page for Paradise Syndrome. CouplandForever (talk) 10:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

I think this the same thing as Paradise Syndrome because neither term is specific and both terms are used by the same people, non-psychologists talking about rich people. ~~Andrew Keenan Richardson~~ 16:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I dissagree, reading both articles it appears that you don't need to be rich to suffer from leisure sickness, which is simply a symptom of being a "workaholic" while paradise syndrome is a result of having accoplished everything that someone wanted to accoplish and becoming depressed. if anything this article hould be merged with the workaholic article as they amount to one and the same thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.72.9.24 (talk) 13:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of References[edit]

There are no reputable sources refernced in the article, only a colection of newspapers. Inclusion of a Jounal article would improve reliablity greatly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.219.126 (talk) 12:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation[edit]

There is no way to prove that "Leisure Sickness" is the cause of those symptoms; there are too many factors. There needs to be more concrete evidence.Nicolasa11 (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leisure sickness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]