Talk:Lesbian Art Project

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lesbian Art Project article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

ArtAndFeminism

This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2015.ArtAndFeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArtAndFeminism articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks of links[edit]

I've moved the blocks of links here... they shouldn't be in the core of an article. Perhaps they are just a holding place for new content to be written?

[1][2][3][4][5]
n.paradoxa: international feminist art journal [6]
LTTR - Feminist genderqueer art collective[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cited in the body of the article. Rest listed as notes. Anup Mehra ^✈ 20:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The ones that are already cited in the article don't need to be repeated. Regarding "notes" do you mean further reading? If so, see WP:Further reading for more information.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, here's an example of what a further reading section should look like Mierle Laderman Ukeles#Further reading.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier it was just like <ref>AuthorName, Title</ref>. They were required to cited properly in order to verify the content of the article. And, I guess, Notes serve as both. Additional sources to establish WP:GNG & sometimes further reading as well. However they do just mention the subject somewhere in the book in one or few pages and do not carry substantial information related to the subject. So, they are better left untouched as notes from mine point of view. Anup Mehra ^✈ 21:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The term "notes" references to citations / references, in other words tied to specific article content. If the sources don't tie to specific article content, but are just a place where a reader can get more information, it's further reading. When I can, I include the page numbers so that readers can get right to the content, but I think that's just a personal choice.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've no objection. WP:POLICY overrides personal choices. Thanks for your edits. Perhaps it is better than earlier now. Anup Mehra ^✈ 21:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lesbian Art Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140203154528/http://sites.moca.org/wack/2007/07/25/wack-audio-tour-lesbian-art-project-carolee-schneemann-suzy-lake-judith-f-baca/ to http://sites.moca.org/wack/2007/07/25/wack-audio-tour-lesbian-art-project-carolee-schneemann-suzy-lake-judith-f-baca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]