Talk:Less Than Hero

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Futurama Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futurama, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futurama articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FuturamaWikipedia:WikiProject FuturamaTemplate:WikiProject FuturamaFuturama articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Futurama tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Futurama tasks:

Ongoing

Bring Futurama up to FA status.
Better define article assessment levels and reassess to include C class.

Needs attention

All images linked in any Futurama article need to have a fair use rationale, this includes:
- ~~episode articles~~ done
- Character and list of character pages
- All miscellaneous pages (as linked in the Futurama template)
All episode pages need to meet the standards of WP:NTVEP. A basic layout for how this can be accomplished is under discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama/Archive 2#Episode article organization-revisited. Examples to follow include "Space Pilot 3000" and "Hell Is Other Robots".

Expand

Futurama Comics and its issues.
Articles related to Producers, Directors and Writers

Other ways to help:
Monitor changes to the project, changes to articles and changes to this to-do list.

hammer and sickle[edit]

Do you think Clobberella's icon is intentionally similar?

While it does look similar, it is indicated in the DVD commentary that the arm is supposed to form a "C" for Clobberela, giving it its odd shape.

Less Than Zero?[edit]

Is the title a reference to the book by Brett Easton Ellis? --Morten LJ 19:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs[edit]

1. the time on the clock: I think it's a joke about similar continuity erros in regular movies. Why else should that happen in an animated series?

2. that happens to benders devices all the time. Why mention it?

WP:EPISODE specifically states that goofs sections should not be included in television episode articles so I have removed them. Star dust 8212 17:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about...[edit]

The reference to The Simpson's Tree House of Horror X Episode Desperately Xeeking Xena

in which Lisa's super hero name is Clobber Girl being related to Leela's Clobberella.

Anyone else think that this is reasonable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emulous (talk • contribs) 10:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Production Notes[edit]

According to TV.com's entry for this episode,

When Bender gets hit by the kangaroo, the cartoon bobble says "01001010." Translated using the ASCII code, the Hex is "4A." Bluntly, it's supposed to mean "Ahhh!"

- [1]

So, if the binary for when Bender gets hit is meant to be "4A" (as in "Aaaa!"), why the mention of the binary translation of "J", which is obviously not what was intended? 66.207.82.177 07:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TV.com is not a reliable source so we cannot assume that their interpretation of what the binary was supposed to mean is correct. On the same note, you've raised enough reasonable doubt about the meaning that I have removed the comment from the article altogether. Someone might try checking the DVD commentary to see if it explained there but otherwise I would recommend leaving it out of the article. The point of a wikipedia article isn't to explain every joke in the show anyway so it's not needed. Star dust 8212 13:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]