Talk:Lexington and West Cambridge Railroad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

This article need's to be worked on, a lot. It need to get an infobox, information onthe services need to be given and a few more pictures and references can get it rated C-class.--SharadbobTalkC 13:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lexington and West Cambridge Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lexington and West Cambridge Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization[edit]

@Dicklyon: Every currently cited online source save two of the 1920s newspaper articles capitalizes "Lexington Branch". I can verify that Karr and Humphries do as well; I don't have copies of Jones or Worden. If you've stumbled across a treasure trove of useful and reliable sources that don't capitalize, please use them to expand and improve the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

West Bedford crossing.[edit]

The reformatory branch crosses Route 62 near the Bedford/Concord town line. There used to be a roadway bridge carrying Route 62 (Concord Road) over the railway, with a whistle stop called "West Bedford." The "route map" diagram shows the Route 62 crossing in Concord, near the town line, but the location of the crossing is actually in the Town of Bedford, not Concord. It's shown on the wrong side of the town line. I don't know how to edit the chart. 174.196.207.92 (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]