This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This isn't a draft list of Cliff Richard television appearances. It's a draft list of Cliff Richard BBC television appearances only. 72.245.246.219 (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Duly noted. Add other television appearances. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just added a heading. If you feel this needs to be moved, please state that clearly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As posted earlier, this page seems to be confusingly titled. It is a detailed list of series and specials broadcast by the BBC starring Cliff Richard. It's not a list of TV appearances by Cliff. There's nothing from all his ITV output and indeed nothing at all of his other BBC work outside of his series and specials. I suppose it could grow into a comprehensive list, but I still think it's mistitled.62.253.196.107 (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be using BBC Genome listings descriptions verbatim. --McGeddon (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent copypasted content has been removed. The remainder is unhelpful commentary.--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I was waiting to see how long it would be before McGeddon/Gorlitz found a way to delete this data. Looks like they've come up with a plan. 62.253.196.107 (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Simply rewriting copypasted BBC-listings text (eg. "the whole show guarantees plenty of 'Good rockin' tonight'!") is all that's needed here. --McGeddon (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let's allow an uninvolved editor decide if it should or should not be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dammit! All the copyright material has been removed. How can the page be deleted now? And the next reason thought up by McGeddon Görlitz is.... drum roll.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.196.107 (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for removing the copypasted content. --McGeddon (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You could have done it yourself. But that would have spoilt your petulant plans. Sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.196.107 (talk) 13:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I could have done. You'll find that bad-faith accusations and personal attacks generally discourage people from helping you out, though. --McGeddon (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can't see anything that indicates help was requested.62.253.196.107 (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing this regardless of your attitude or smug sense of superiority. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Personal attacks are so unpleasant and create a bad faith atmosphere on wikipedia. I am surprised McGeddon Görlitz continues in this manner whilst criticising others. A warning should be posted on their talk pages, but what would be the point? It would be deleted and threats against this editor would be made in retaliation.62.253.196.107 (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you feel that calling you out for your bad attitude is a personal attack or an bad faith. I will ignore the rest of your libelous rant. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing libelous appears on this page. 62.253.196.107 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
