Talk:List of Crayon Shin-chan episodes (1992–2001)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of Crayon Shin-chan episodes (1992–2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting[edit]

This article is currently at 393,975 bytes. Splitting it into 1992-1996 and 1997-2001 should yield two articles of ~216k and ~181k. Is there any reason to not do this? pauli133 (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SIZESPLIT, in this case, < 40kB/40,000 chars, Length alone does not justify division. There are 2 similar page, but not as big as this page, should those page splitting into per 5 years too? And also, There a not big questions that interwiki link will be not easy for this page. There are too many reasons to not do this from my point of view. At least I don't think it should be done now.--LaMagiaaa 12:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]