Talk:List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches (2010–2019)

Page split, now what?

I've taken the big steps and split the tables up into two pages.

Most of the big stuff should be present.

I've yet to clean up the references, and would appreciate help resolving any errors.

Raftonyxdevoutly (talk) 12:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

As for what's next? I'd be interested in seeing the support of people for moving the 2010-2019 'Notable launches' to this article to help trim down the 2020+ section. -AndrewRG10 (talk) 23:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Graphs

Should the following graphs be added to the header?

Rocket configurations

5

10

15

20

25

30

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

'16

'17

'18

'19

•   Falcon 9 v1.0
•   Falcon 9 v1.1
•   Falcon 9 Full Thrust
•   Falcon 9 FT (reused)
•   Falcon 9 Block 5
•   Falcon 9 B5 (reused)
•   Falcon Heavy

Launch sites

5

10

15

20

25

30

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

'16

'17

'18

'19

•   CCSFS, SLC-40
•   KSC, LC-39A
•   VSFB, SLC-4E

Launch outcomes

6

12

18

24

30

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

'16

'17

'18

'19

•   Loss before launch
•   Loss during flight
•   Partial failure
•   Success (commercial and government)
•   Success (Starlink)

Booster landings

5

10

15

20

25

30

'10

'11

'12

'13

'14

'15

'16

'17

'18

'19

•   Ground-pad failure
•   Drone-ship failure
•   Ocean test failure
•   Parachute test failure
•   Ground-pad success
•   Drone-ship success
•   Ocean test success
•   No attempt

AmigaClone (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

I see no problem with adding the graphs. We could put that under a heading 'Launch statistics', and then demote the individual years to sub-headings under a new heading 'Launches' or 'Past launches'.

Raftonyxdevoutly (talk) 11:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

"Falcon 9 flight 29" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Falcon 9 flight 29 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 9 § Falcon 9 flight 29 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Is the Orbcomm OG-2 Launch intentionally in line with CRS-1?

This seems to be an error. ManuelRottschaefer (talk) 13:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

It's intentional, the flight had two payloads. They had different outcomes so they are in different rows. --mfb (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)