Talk:List of Hollyoaks characters (2012)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

Ryan?[edit]

Hi, just wondering why Ryan from Comapny Magazine isn't on here? --MSalmon (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason - just everyone's busy.Rain the 1 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jen's surname[edit]

Have edited all references to "Gilmore" to the correct spelling of "Gilmour" - as seen on Tilly's flight booking: http://i46.tinypic.com/34y4i87.jpg 195.188.180.1 (talk) 08:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She been credited as "Gilmore" in magazines, TV listings websites, the official website states "Gilmore" for both Jen and Liam. Numerous other sources also refer to the character as "Gilmore". I'd suggest that whoever created that prop didn't do their homework.Rain the 1 22:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Ed Morrison to others?[edit]

Should Ed be moved to others as he is not been seen since July and has not appeared for very long. If he does stay then maybe Connie & Herb Carter should be moved as they were in as long as Ed and has as much storyline info. EastStreet Lover, Soap Researcher :-) (talk) 15:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ed has development info, so he shouldn't be moved to Others. If development info can be found for Herb and Connie then they can be moved out of the table. A character's duration doesn't determine if they can be moved, some one/two episode characters have their own sections because they made an impact. Take Gethin Williams for instance. - JuneGloom Talk 23:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Shaw[edit]

dylan has been given a last name, its on the offical hollyoaks website — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.251.127.18 (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan is listed as "Departed", yet accordiing to Hollyoaks sources (10 May 2013) his character has not departed, and will be very much involved in the new Kane family plot lines with the (recast) Lacey Kane.


Jim McGinn[edit]

Surely Jim is a Barrister not a solicitor he defended both murder and perverting the course of justice both crown court offences (QueenAlexandria) 22:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC) (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Over the long time that this series has been running, you should have worked out that the producers don't have the first clue about the legal profession, about the difference detween barristers and solicitors, between Circuit Judges and High Court Judges, etc., They also haven't worked out that people with criminal records like Jack and Darren couldn't possibly hold personal licences - and the same applies to Ste. One doesn't watch "Hollyoaks" for realism, just for good entertainment!

Sienna Blake[edit]

Surely Sienna Blake should be given an actual page now? Her entry is way too long for being listed here? --Onlythetruthisappropriate (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]