Talk:List of Peel sessions

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Intro[edit]

This article is being created to replace Category:Peel Sessions artists as mandated by the outcome of the CFD for the category. It is a large list and it will require more than eight seconds to get into shape. Otto4711 16:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. -- Grigorowitsch (talk) 14:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Wikipedia Entry Bands[edit]

I notice that all of these bands have a Wikipedia Entry, so surely there must be more artists who don't who have recorded sessions? CAn anyone add any more to the list? JimHxn 18:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, shitloads: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/johnpeel/artists/a/ We just need a kind volunteer to wade in and list 'em... Fl owerparty^☀ 17:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've been through the list and added all the bands that have recorded sessions. A couple of bands/artists have been removed as they only had entries in the Festive 50 rather than actually recording a session. (MuteJoe 19:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Non-Peel[edit]

The lads Kershaw and Lamacq also had a lot of interesting bands on their shows - any plans to index those performances? Drutt (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MuteJoe[edit]

Wow. Last time I checked this article it didn't have all/most of the session dates. Cheers for the good work. dfg (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huge respect and thanks to MuteJoe! What a great job! Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation[edit]

I've done a big edit to change unnecessary capitalisation of words such as "and" & "the" in band names, as per Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It ended up making my eyes go a little squiggly so if anyone spots any mistakes, please feel free to correct ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

albums[edit]

Should the albums that the peel sessions were on (if any) put into the list? The Laxative (talk) 11:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

alphabetical?[edit]

i think these sessions would be better represented chronologically —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.147.76 (talk) 08:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This could be done if the information were put into a sort-able table. JamesThomasMoon1979 17:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the ability to sort chronologically would be great - please!Happypoems (talk) 19:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(5 years later) I concur !--Abolibibelot (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[a few months later and a different user] then why don't we start doing that? seems strange to talk about doing it rather than doing it. this is important stuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cammiesjammies (talk • contribs) 20:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

here I got it started, I'll finish in a few weeks I guess

|- ! Date !! Band !! details |- | 21 September 1967 ||Tomorrow|| first band recorded for a Peel Session |- | 25 September 1967||Pink Floyd|| first of two appearances in 1967 |- | 27 September 1967 || Traffic ||first of two appearances |- | 30 October 1967 || Tyrannosaurus Rex || ??? |- | 7 November 1967 || Fleetwood Mac || text |- | 21 October 2004 ||Skimmer|| Last band to record a Peel Session |-

Depeche Mode[edit]

Did they record a session? They are not listed on the BBC site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/johnpeel/artists/d/ LaHaine (talk) 22:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC) They did an session for The Evening Show for Richard Skinner but nothing for PeelMartinwheatley (talk) 21:59, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bridget Saint John[edit]

Played at least two sessions in the early 70's. I heard them. AlanParkerFrance (talk) 21:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Check under Bridget St John You will find themMartinwheatley (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC) there[reply]

Table of Contents Error?[edit]

Is it just me or are the TOC alphabetical navigation links not working? Anybody know how to fix the code? Wellesradio (talk) 02:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of Peel sessions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111003090334/http://www.ninehertz.co.uk/news-item/34 to http://www.ninehertz.co.uk/news-item/34

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some internal links are...silly[edit]

Someone who is more versed in editing may want to clean up this list - for example, pointing on "Submarine" shows the preview to the Wiki article for submarine boats. 2A02:560:5868:7B00:F864:AE06:676B:2262 (talk) 23:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits on pipes & wikilinks[edit]

Examining this diff here [1], there are an overwhelming number of recent changes removing the correctly piped targets, causing a significant quantity of wikilinks to go to disambig pages and obviously incorrect articles. I have reverted all recent edits to the last (relatively) stable version [2]. @Razdan1974 I do recommend you please discuss on the talk page per WP:BRD before making further edits. ResonantDis_tortion 19:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also User talk:Razdan1974. Certes (talk) 20:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]