Talk:List of Playboy Playmates of 2010

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No separate articles[edit]

Why are the 2010 Playmates listed together in one article? Is this just temporary? Every other Playmate has her own wikipedia article. Why the sudden inconsistency? AshidMapantz (talk) 06:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see by your talk page that an article that you worked on, Regina Deutinger, was nominated for deletion. In that AFD, there is a link to the discussion about whether Playmates are notable simply for being Playmates. In the past they have been automatically notable per WP:PORNSTAR but recently a few editors were able to push through a change to that guideline. So, there are articles for the Playmates of most(?) every year now (there are still a few, I think, that need to be created) often with links to their main article included in their listing on the "of year" lists. Dismas|^(talk) 07:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the portion of WP:PORNSTAR that used to say, since sometime in mid 2009, that playmates are all notable, was based on a prior history where no playmate article had ever stayed deleted from the project since its inception. In a recent spate of playmate AfDs, a good chunk were kept. However, some were deleted. The content of any deleted article was transferred into these list articles, and no actual content was deleted. These AfDs were highly contested, and you should not assume that creating articles on new playmates is no longer appropriate. They may, however, to subject to more scrutiny from those editors who have decided to move away from a bright-line rule.--Milowent (talk) 15:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would PMoY Claire Sinclair be worthy of a separate article? 84.161.92.248 (talk) 21:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is just ridiculous. No content was deleted? So how come Regina Deutinger has just over two lines? That article has been worked on? Really?
And then Ida Ljungqvist has her own article, but her section in List of Playboy Playmates of 2008 is so long (though currently has only two lines) the article would fit there finely. 82.141.127.203 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you calm down and be more specific about what you're complaining about? Since I'm not sure what you're worked up about, I'm not sure if this will answer your questions but here's a shot at it...

Deutinger's article was never more than a couple lines. Not counting the fancruft puffery that is.
Ljungqvist's article is longer, yes. As with anyone who has a main article, this list serves to just summarize their work with Playboy and the main article goes into more detail.

If this doesn't answer your concerns, please be more specific about what you're talking about. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 01:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was said to be "worked on", so I thought it was longer.

And the Ljungqvist article: the infobox is the same in both, but the text in the article is only half in length of the infobox. So it would fit nicely in that list of 2008 playmates. 82.141.75.152 (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did Jaime Faith Edmondson Convert To Islam?[edit]

No. This is not her in this youtube video [1] (who is that, btw?). Jaime is tweeting away here [2], no burka to be seen.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links in the Playboy Lists[edit]

There has been recent action to delete external links to the Playboy Wiki in these lists.
If you are interested, either for or against, there is a discussion about it here: Noticeboard for External links. Wikilister (talk) 13:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Playboy Playmates of 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513071532/http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/dolphins-cheerleaders-perk-up-the-amazing-race-22090 to http://sportsbybrooks.com/dolphins-cheerleaders-perk-up-the-amazing-race-22090

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Separate article for Shera Bechard?[edit]

Her story is proving to be more than just one or two news articles. I believe it's worth giving Shera Bechard her own article, rather than clogging up this page with the evolving Elliott Broidy story. Any support? PvOberstein (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]