Talk:List of RAF squadron codes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USAAF codes[edit]

During WW2, the USAAF also used similar squadron codes. There does not seem to be any info on them on Wikipedia. Anyone up to creating the List of USAAF Squadron Codes? Mjroots (talk) 07:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I can'tfind any references to verify this entry, can anyone help?

| DU || No. 22 (RCAF) Squadron RAF || 22 (RCAF) Sqn.

Petebutt (talk) 01:55, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further, this claim: "Squadron codes Data from: Flying Units of the RAF[1]" apart from being in the wrong place, is patently incorrect. Lake is known to be incomplete as regards markings. As a single example, the AO code shown for 211 Squadron in the table is certainly not from Lake. That code was not shown for any period by Lake, publishing in 1999. In fact the squadron id letters AO appeared on the Squadron's Hawker Hinds in the Middle East from October 1938 (when RAF units took up war-time markings with the prospect of war ariing from the Munich Crisis. A more likely, more complete and more reliable overall source is Flintham and Thomas "Combat Codes" edn 2 2008 (Pen & Sword).

Single Letters?[edit]

Some of the single letter "squadron codes" should be removed. Some of these are actually individual aircraft codes. Many of the Fighter Recon Squadrons never carried two letter squadron codes, only unique single letters for each individual aircraft. The single digit codes are fine, as for a period in 1943-44, RAF Coastal Command stopped using two letter squadron codes and instead had each station identify their squadrons by a single digit number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camal697 (talkcontribs) 03:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of RAF squadron codes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Codes used more than once[edit]

Why are there duplicates in the list? Were these at different times, in different theatres? 2A02:2788:11A8:34:E2CB:4EFF:FE88:1A2D (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]