Talk:List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cumbria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expanded table[edit]

With 278 sites it fell over due to too many template calls when formated as other recent sssi lists, so I called directly to the citation refs and ticks - which solved the problem, although it will still be pretty slow for most users. But what can you do when a county has so many good places!.

Limitations on current data. I have not viewed all the citations in creating this table, relying on data from the the Natural England summary spreadsheet. There are two specific issues that may arise from this:-

  • geological interest: I have relied on the 'GCR' tag to show which have geological interest, and have only added a joint interest where a GCR also has other designations (not including AONB or NP). This may be a false asumption on a few sites, and future checking will be helpful.
  • creation date: This is the major limitation of the summary - it only lists a renewal date so does not show the original creation date. One day it may be necessary to go through the refs to find this information. RobinLeicester (talk) 17:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely a lot of template calls, and pretty slow to load, even on 20 Meg/broadband. I trimmed down the content to try to speed things up. Naturally 278 rows is a lot, nothing can be done about that. After some messing, I felt the best move was to remove the lengthy GPS coords and just leave OS grid refs. That made a big difference to the pageload time (see totals below). It still didn't allow me to go back to {{y}} templates, but oh well.. as long as it looks like other SSSI lists, all's good.

Before
<!--
NewPP limit report
Preprocessor node count: 137917/1000000
Post-expand include size: 1471810/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 514219/2048000 bytes
Highest expansion depth: 23/40
Expensive parser function count: 0/500
-->
After
<!--
NewPP limit report
Preprocessor node count: 21408/1000000
Post-expand include size: 340150/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 62995/2048000 bytes
Highest expansion depth: 13/40
Expensive parser function count: 0/500
-->

Cheers, Ma®©usBritish{chat} 04:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links?[edit]

It looks horribly as if all the links to Natural England pages might need to be updated: for Shap Fells I found the detailed "citation" info not at http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000081.pdf but at https://designatedsites.naturalengland.org.uk/PDFsForWeb/Citation/1000081.pdf and for Arnside Knott not at http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1004315.pdf but at https://designatedsites.naturalengland.org.uk/PDFsForWeb/Citation/1004315.pdf . If this is a permanent change and not just a temporary blip, presumably every link here and on all the parallel lists for other counties will need to be updated. Ouch. PamD 12:09, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Sites_of_Special_Scientific_Interest_in_Cumbria&oldid=1208298389"