Talk:List of South African locomotive classes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Locomotives Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Tablifying[edit]

I have some doubts about including the "Disposition" and "Notes" columns in the table. This can get out of hand with several owners owning items from the same class, eg Rovos, Reefsteamers, FOTR, Atlantic Steam, Sandstone, the Welsh RR, museums, plinthed in towns, etc. In my opinion that kind of info should rather be worked into the text of the individual items and the table should basically just be a list of links. I suggest we stick with locomotive and series where applicable, wheel arrangement, and builder for the table.

Should perhaps rethink the "sortable" on the Class column too. André Kritzinger 16:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre Kritzinger (talk • contribs)

Carter Gallery[edit]

I don't agree about including this link. Why give exposure to a copyrighted site while some of those images would have been of great use if they had been shared in the Wikimedia Commons? André Kritzinger (talk) 00:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]