Talk:List of Star Trek materials

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions[edit]

Need to add the following.

What? No Neutronium? It must be added but I don't have the time. Wikipedia it.

Red Matter

Omega whatever from a voyager episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.86.47 (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added the omega molecule. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ItazuEstamaru (talk • contribs) 12:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diburnium. From TOS "By Any Other Name." Spok is examining a bar on a prison window, and notes that it is "similar to diburnium, but considerably more dense." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.201.92.42 (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trilithium[edit]

I think I can remember some TNG episode where terrorists tried to extract trilithium remnants from the warp drive, and it was said that it was very unstable and rather explosive. In that episode the enterprise was abandoned because it was cleaned by some green ray/forcefield. anyone remembers this too (so we can add it)? or was the material something else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.61.9.75 (talk) 09:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC) The TNG episode is called Starship Mine. In that episode, trilithium was a byproduct of the warp drive and the target of the thieves during the barion sweep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.193.94.40 (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent aluminum article[edit]

Thought this might be of interest,"Transparent Aluminum" at Science Daily.--T. Anthony (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this may not be the best place to announce this, but i added it to the section on transparent aluminum. I suspect this material deserves its own article, being a possible new state of matter. i would prefer someone with more science writing experience attempt to write the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article on transparent aluminum is largely inaccurate. 'Ceramic aluminum oxynitride,' ie. 'transparent aluminum' has existed since the early 80's and is in use by the military, but is somewhat expensive to manufacture. It is not a 'new state of matter.'

http://blog.makezine.com/2012/01/17/transparent-aluminum/

http://science.howstuffworks.com/transparent-aluminum-armor.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.2.1.104 (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article already covered that material as well as the "new state of matter". I have moved the paragraphs on the various real-world materials into chronological order, so the ceramic one now comes first. Thanks for the sources; I have cited those, and explained both materials more clearly. – Fayenatic London 18:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

warranted link?[edit]

There is a link to an actor (Alex Henteloff) in a sentence about the novelisation of a film in section Transparent aluminium. I am unaware of other actors in this position in novels. Alanthehat (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

@Nadirali: "Notable" is now stated in the lead paragraph, but is taken for granted in the title. Please stop renaming the page as "notable". If it was necessary, then every page in Category:Lists would have "notable" in the title. – Fayenatic London 23:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look, there are too many thing to list on Wikipedia, but only the notable ones get listed and titled have a look at List of notable Canadians as an example.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 02:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? That has been a redirect to List of Canadians for the last six years. – Fayenatic London 08:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK but we got List of exceptional asteroids.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 01:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tholian silk[edit]

The link for this directs to an article on 'The Tholian Web' episode of TOS which does not mention silk. Jokem (talk) 04:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]