Talk:List of The 100 characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grounders[edit]

The grounders are split into clans and the clan that Anya and Lexa are in are known as the Tree People or Treekru. Martingolding96 (talk) 23:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

City of Light Affiliation[edit]

City of Light affiliation does not have to be listed for characters other than the ones who are specifically created for that story line. I have removed it from Jaha and Jackson. If it is believed that it should be listed on all who have been a part of CoL, then it should also be added to Abby, Ontari and other characters. I believe it us unnecessary. User:BSCD128 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. Unlike other affiliations, which are static, city of light affiliations are constantly being changed. --AussieLegend () 10:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated
None of this excuses your edit warring and now-violation of 3RR. Alex|The|Whovian? 11:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A 3RR violation requires 4 reverts in 24 hours. BSCD128 has only made 3 reverts. You have both edit warred. --AussieLegend () 12:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The initial edit is counted. That's 4. Alex|The|Whovian? 14:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The initial edit was not a reversion so it is not counted. --AussieLegend () 14:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Octavia Blake article[edit]

I'm putting together an article for Octavia Blake, and I'm having some trouble finishing it up. Please, help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gonzalogallard/sandbox#Octavia_Blake Gonzalogallard (talk) 18:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It needs references, and the image should be of the character, not the actress. Alex|The|Whovian? 03:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cast table[edit]

I have proceeded to eliminate the part of "Affiliation", I think it is a little unnecessary, and that information is clarified in the description of the respective characters. No obstantes I do not know how important this can be for other users, in any case, I think it can be restore.--Philip J FryTalk 02:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have a problem with removal of "Affiliation" but your edits to the table introduced a number of problems. Row and column scopes, required for compliance with MOS:ACCESS/MOS:DTT, were removed as were column widths while some incorrect column widths replaced them. Formatting was removed and this is a "list of characters" article so characters should be listed first (as they were) for consistency with the rest of the article. I've corrected these issues as well as some others. --AussieLegend () 19:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@AussieLegend: I understand, but why not link the characters, as i had done? For example "[#Finn Collins|Finn Collins]". So you could get to the section of that character faster instead of going down, I do not know if you noticed that the article is a bit extensive. At least on my computer it is a bit extensive.--Philip J FryTalk 21:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I must have deleted those links while I was trying to fix the table. They're a good idea. --AussieLegend () 12:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

haracter table[edit]

This edit summary makes no sense:

  • Not how column widths are supposed to work - Actually, that's exactly how column widths work. They all have to add up to the total width, which was set at 78%. 15+15+(6x8) = 78. The first change removed the overall width specification which forces it to 100% by default. 15+15+(6x8) is not 100!
  • (they're supposed to be %'age of the TOTAL, regardless of what that figure is - And they were.
  • table should not be set to some arbitrary width - Table widths can be set to anything. There is no rule that they can't be set to a particular width and setting the width to 100% IS setting the table to an arbitrary width.

That said, the first column was wrapping when there was no need to do that so I've widened it to 21%, which the fits everything neatly on 1 line. 26% is far too wide for the first two columns. It's just completely unnecessary to have so much whitespace. Note that the season widths were set to 8% so that they would all appear to be the same width. --AussieLegend () 14:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]