Talk:List of ThunderCats characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additional information[edit]

There really should be some mention of the Code of Thundera or how Thundrainium is like kryptonite to the 'Cats.208.61.68.33 (talk)


Cheetarah had feelings for Lion-O in the series not Tygra is the comment in her section about the wildstorm comic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.113.173 (talk) 10:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


In the series Cheetara had feelings for Lion-O (and vice-versa) but it was never seen fully developing in the series, only hinted as was customary for animated shows at the time. The only implications of any form of relationship between Cheetara and Tygra was in the first episode and then in the form of them being colleagues or just simply very close friend, otherwise there never were anything going on between Tygra and Cheetara. As for Tygra there were signs of romantic development between Tygra and Willa, the leader of the Warrior-Maidens, during the series. But just as with Lion-O and Cheetara, never fully developing further. The only time Cheetara and Tygra became a couple was in a fanfic comic, which as I recall was completely rejected by the creators of the show. When it comes to Mandora, there were only a mutual admiration of each others skills and strength of personality between her and Lion-O. There were small signs during the show that Mandora have or had a relation in the past but put her career as an Evil-Chaser before everything. Then I just want to point out that Pumyra and Ben-Gali were a couple already before they were introduced in the 1985 ThunderCat show, which easily can be seen in "ThunderCats Ho!" when they help LynxO and after that too. - Lore cleric (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting character articles[edit]

I have proposed that the main ThunderCats characters deserve solo articles. I have began with Snarf (ThunderCats) what does anyone else think?. Dwanyewest (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the template. If you make any more, be sure to add it. Dream Focus 19:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mumm-Ra (Thundercats) is the next article I am working on any improvements would be welcome. I am seperating it from this article as I feel it needs streamlining and its bloated plus I feel there is sufficent third person evidence to justify a solo article nowDwanyewest (talk) 06:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1) you can't propose that the characters deserve there own articles. That's an opinion. You have to prove they are notable enough to split. 2) four references isn't enough to make these articles notable they are far too small...and are mainly overtaken by in universe information. You still need to find more info about creation and concept. This is clearly not sufficient. We told you this in the wikiproject.Bread Ninja (talk) 12:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Organize character sections[edit]

can we re-organize these character sections to not be so in-universe. was wondering if we organized the characters per just Protagonists-antagonists-support.Bread Ninja (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Thunderian info[edit]

It seems the Thunderian info is just too in-universe and redundant considering it can be covered in their own personal sections and anymore information that doesnt cover the main characters specifically can be noted in the main article Lucia Black (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been keeping the overall Thunderian info above the Thunderians yet the anonymous users keep relocating it underneath Claudus' section. Rtkat3 (talk) 7:10, December 17 2012 (UTC)
It doesn't really need it. And i personally agree with the anonymous user. You're missing the point. Lucia Black (talk) 00:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It does if it was to mention all the overall information about the Thunderians. Some other people have even undid the edits done by the anonymous user since they said that the anonymous user never left an explanation for this. Outside of that, anything revolving around the Lizards, Jackals, and Monkeys are mentioned with the Mutants that are associated with them. Rtkat3 (talk) 8:34, December 27 2012 (UTC)

Do you know what WP:In-Universe? It makes this article focus too much in the background of the story. This info can be covered in the main article of thundercats but not here.Lucia Black (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of ThunderCats characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ThunderCats characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]