Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Radiohead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured listList of awards and nominations received by Radiohead is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted
February 3, 2020Featured list removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 28, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Radiohead (pictured) have received ten nominations at the Grammy Awards, which won them the Best Alternative Music Performance award twice, for OK Computer in 1998 and Kid A in 2001?
Current status: Former featured list

Problems with this article[edit]

A. It lists Thom Yorke solo nominations (for The Eraser) together with Radiohead nominations.

B. Yet it doesn't list Nigel Godrich's several Grammy nominations for best production/engineering work on Radiohead's albums.

C. It doesn't mention their Ivor Novello award for In Rainbows, Mercury Prize nominations, etc. etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.38.143 (talkcontribs)

Thanks for pointing those out. I have added a few more. Please let me know if any are missing. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D: Someone appears to editing or damaging this article or both by changing the awards they have won from nominations and there is contradictory information on the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.233.233 (talk) 19:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E: The article firstly claims that Radiohead have been nominated for 6 BRIT awards and have yet to actually win one. It then in the section on the BRITs claims that they have won EVERY time they have been nominated. They can't have both lost AND won every time! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.218.27 (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalsim / inconsistency?[edit]

The infobox says they won 2 Q awards, the lead and article say 3 - which is it? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The citation used only gives 2 Q awards, so I've amended accordingly. --JD554 (talk) 07:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've put it back to 3 as I found a better reference. --JD554 (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of awards and nominations received by Radiohead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]