Talk:List of carousels on the National Register of Historic Places

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Amusement Parks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former?[edit]

Should former NRHP carousels be listed here? If so, see Jantzen Beach Carousel. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 05:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetized list[edit]

In my opinion, this list was a bit of a mess whose organization made no sense. I alphabetized the list by state and then by city, which is how the National Register organizes its lists. I realize there are other ways to organize it, so if this violates the original intention of the list, I have no objection to it being organized differently. I do think, however, that it should be organized in some recognizable order for it to be beneficial. Farragutful (talk) 00:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]