Talk:List of cases affected by the Kho Jabing case

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

While it seems that the split was not properly done per WP:SUBARTICLE, I do think this article should stay and be linked with/from WP:SIZERULE. I do not disagree with the deletion of Final efforts to save Kho Jabing's life as it seems that kind of information should be presented in full on the Kho Jabing page.

However I think there is sufficient 'distance' between Kho Jabing and its impact on further cases to split it off, with some summary on its impact on other cases on the Kho Jabing page with a 'Main article : ...' section header. Xenmorpha (talk) 10:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would want to say that i have trimmed off whatever i wrote on Kho Jabing, since i have separated the cases written here. because i have exams coming up, i had to rush through my studying so that is why i did not do better than expected in terms of splitting the article. sorry. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 02:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]