Talk:List of disability studies journals

List of disability studies journals is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (there are many journals pages can be listed and external list can be added) --Withkamlesh (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comliance with guidelines[edit]

Please could editors comply with the guidelines at WP:Stand-alone lists and also with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section by providing in the lead citation to sources that establish the selection criteria, and by providing the necessary background information, and references to sources for that background information, that would indicate encyclopaedic content? --Bejnar (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicative ?[edit]

Could editors explain why this article is not unnecessarily duplicative of Category:Disability studies and Category:Disability publications? Categories are auto-maintaining, lists require editor attention, so absent a reason for a separate list, the category would be preferred. --Bejnar (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDUP. (categories aren't an alternative or competitor to a list, they're a complement). I don't know if this is a notable topic. I tend to think it might be (feel free to AfD, of course), but it's not redundant/duplicative. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]