Talk:List of heritage sites in Cape Town CBD and the Waterfront

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of heritage sites in Cape Town CBD and the Waterfront was copied or moved into List of heritage sites in the Bo-Kaap of Cape Town with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of heritage sites in Cape Town CBD, the Waterfront, and the Bo-Kaap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081231164928/http://196.35.231.29/sahra/default.aspx to http://196.35.231.29/sahra/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PEIS[edit]

I reverted the recent addition of {{Cape Town|history}} because it caused the page to exceed Wikipedia's Post-expand include size template limit.

The best solution I can think of is to split the list into 3 articles, one each for the CBD, Waterfront, and Bo-Kapp. This will leave plenty of "PIES-limit" headroom to include {{Cape Town|history}} at the bottom of each article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping to Pbsouthwood, it was your edit that I reverted. Again, it was a good edit editorially but it caused technical issues. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

davidwr. Fair comment, and I agree with your proposed solution. That is one ungainly table. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 16:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have split out List of heritage sites in the Bo-Kaap of Cape Town. It was somewhat tedious, and there are probably some errors. I will check what I can, but some sites are not easily identifiable for locality. I may do the Waterfront when I get around to it, but no guarantee when that might happen. Anyone else who feels that way inclined is welcome to the job. There are also sites listed from Fresnaye, which is not in the CBD or the Waterfront, or Bo-Kaap. Size has been reduced by a third. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 11:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since the technical issue has been solved, it's now an editorial decision whether further splitting is needed and what to do about Fresnave sites. Do they get split just to keep the title accurate, or does the page get moved so it's clear Fresnave sites belong in this list? Again, that's an editorial decision. There is no deadline for decisions like this. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]