This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Why is this edit here? What is the use of those two paragraphs? This page is just a list (wp:list). This page does not and should not deal with Zoroastrianism and their future after Sasanid. Also the list should not say what was a "shahanshah" as a monarchy/king (absolute or not). What others think? Shouldn't we revert to this edition? Xashaiar (talk) 00:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize, that's in the arguments to avoid in deletion? It is you that is misunderstanding the discussion if you think this is a discussion about deleting or keeping the article. Most featured articles have the same information as this one does, even newly promoted lists such as List of emperors of the Han Dynasty. That would mean consensus supports such. warrior4321 00:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Correction (the link was above what I wanted to link): You are misunderstanding the entire discussion. See elsewhere existence is not good reason for that edit and WP:IRRELEVANT and similar discussions there!. The info you provide is irrelevant here. I am not disputing it, I am disputing its relevancy here.Xashaiar (talk) 00:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC):[reply]
(edit conflict) It's still irrelevant. The information on this article is not on those other featured lists, it just contains the same criteria, the same information such as the years of reign, type of government etc. warrior4321 00:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When trying to use WP:IRRELEVANT to back your claims, are you seriously saying that Zoroastrianism and the Sassanid Shahenshahs are as irrelevant as a tiger and a light bulb? warrior4321 00:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not directly related to Zoroastrianism and you are adding materials that do not belong here. This list is simple: kings of Sasanid Iran and nothing else. Please hear.Xashaiar (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In some cases, editors have perpetuated disputes by sticking to an allegation or viewpoint long after the consensus of the community has rejected it. When has consensus rejected it? On the contrary, this is consensus, as I proved with the other featured lists. WarriorForThreeToOne 23:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Look you are going to another battle?? Do you remember "I" was the one to teach you that Persian is not Iranian and you refused to understand the matters? Now you are here and try to tell me that Zoroastrianism has much to do with this list? Are you going to repeat this and give toamto, tiger, light blub examples (your comment above)? Please stop this and try to add encyclopaedic and relevant materials to wikipedia. I am not disputing the materials, I am disputing its relevance. The consensus was established simply by "looking at article history" when it was peacefully there... Xashaiar (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You did not teach me anything. Nothing, zip, nada. It was Fullstop that showed me the difference. When I asked you the relevance of the Behistun Inscription towards Persian vs Iranian, you said you didn't know what to say. The only thing you have taught me is that you love to battle and push your views of Iranian nationalism. Everything added is encyclopedic and relevant. If featured lists (which are supposed to be perfect) have it, then it must be right. You have given me so many links in the above comments, and not even one is the correct one in this scenario. WarriorForThreeToOne 23:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know what to say is another way of saying "you do not get it and it is impossible to make you get it". Exactly like this article that "I do not know what to say" because you do not get it. The material on Iranian religion of Zoroastrianism is irrelevant here in this list.Xashaiar (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If it impossible then how did Fullstop explain it to me? Don't talk nonsense. There is only one sentence on Zoroastrianism, it is very relevant. The state religion of the empire was Zoroastrianism, one sentence on the religion is fine. WarriorForThreeToOne 23:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it was impossible, he did explain but you have not got it yet. That's why you call it "non-sense".Xashaiar (talk) 23:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you even aware of "what" I called nonsense? I called your statement that was it was impossible to understand nonsense. Now look who's going off-topic. :) WarriorForThreeToOne 23:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Look you were somewhat uncivil, broke 3rr, and removed my tag. I am not going to report you. If destroying this articles make you learn about history, then go on. Do whatever you want with this article. Xashaiar (talk) 23:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Came by this article sort of by accident, and just read the frst few lines. It begins:
The Shahenshahs of the Sassanid Empire ruled over a vast majority of land, even continuing its role as a superpower in Asia.
You can't start an encyclopedia article like that! "Vast majority of land" - what does that mean? Is it an incorrect translation from some other langauge? "Even continuing its role" - whose role? Continued after what? Why "even"?--Nø (talk) 15:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
