Talk:List of organisations designated as terrorist by Australia

	Australia portal List of organisations designated as terrorist by Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

listing[edit]

Aruran Vinayagamoorthy and Sivarajah Yathavan have been charged with "being a member of a terrorist organisation, making funds available to a terrorist organisation and intentionally providing support or resources to a terrorist organisation." The group in question is the Tamil Tigers - is there a reason it is not on the list? --Lollerkeet 00:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its because this list has only organisations currently listed under the legislation, Tamil Tigers are yet to be listed, I had just checked the official site expecting them to have been added. Gnan garra 01:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ASIO logo.jpg[edit]

Image:ASIO logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

– Consistency with Category:Organizations designated as terrorist by Canada and similar categories, and with each other. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, but retain the Australian spelling: List of organisations designated as terrorist by Australia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support and agree with Necrothesp re spelling. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Most of the text of the Australia one discusses the country's laws about such organizations; it's more of an article about an Australian legal concept and not simply a Wikipedia list, so maybe titling it "List of" would be confusing. 73.223.72.200 (talk) 22:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.