Talk:List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Eclipses Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Eclipses task force.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of solar eclipses in the 16th century which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link individual eclipses or not?[edit]

Looking through the history to this pagee, people have tried adding links to various eclipses, and other people have removed the links, such as Solar eclipse of July 16, 2186 [1], Solar eclipse of October 26, 2144 [2], etc. It looks like the general trend is a) Articles about 22nd century eclipses being removed (See 2144 above, and also Solar eclipse of October 7, 2135, and b) Them not being included as links on this article (See 2135 and 2144).

I'm not particularly interested in trying to change this precedent, more to formalise it here so it's less ambigous in the future.

Am I correct in thinking that the 'policy' is that, until further notice, eclipses in the 22nd century are to be name-only rather than link? SqueakSquawk4 (talk) 22:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, and this goes for all lists, circular redirects to a list article are removed. The 2186 link was a redirect, now it is not, which is why it has been added, while the others are still redirects. Primefac (talk) 12:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]