Talk:Little Man (2006 film)

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

slashfilm[edit]

maybe we should add this? http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20060716163812624 203.206.236.73 09:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's notable to add that to the article. Not like it's everyday that a movie hits the bottom so fast. FyreNWater 20:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Responses[edit]

I removed a POV statement from the responses section concerning IMDB. 71.31.156.127 04:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Similarities[edit]

Revert the following plot similarities:

A similar plot is seen in the Bugs Bunny short film, "Baby Buggy Bunny", but the thief steals cash instead of a piece of jewelery.

The Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers episode "Dirty Rotten Diapers" also has a similar plot, in which an adult poses as a baby to steal jewelery.

A very similar plot happens in the film Blue Streak with Martin Lawrence, only Lawrence pretends to be a cop instead of a baby.

The movie Problem Child is also very similar to this. A couple who want children decide to take in a bratty orphan/robber pretending to be a baby and the grandfather hates him.

Please explain why these should not be included.

--Jvsett 16:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the fact that this is a horrible, horrible movie which has been known to cause diabetes and cancer in lab mice upon repeated viewings a good enough reason? --Dooby Scoo 02:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While that may be true - and I wouldn't know because I have yet to have the pleasure of seeing this film - I still think the premise has some striking similarities other films out there.... --Jvsett 17:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Lipton...?[edit]

"James Lipton defended the film throwing many fundraisers and even a small parade outside of Atlanta, sadly, the Wayans Brothers blamed their low box office numbers on his over-advertising of the movie. The relationship between James and the Wayans Brothers has been rocky since."

...does anyone have evidence for this? A quick Google search turned up nothing, and it seems unbelievable three or four different ways. (Whether or not it's true, it sounds funnier than the actual movie.) Kagredon 08:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia section remove[edit]

Can you please help any registered users to remove trivia section. Any miscellaneous information is avoided. ApprenticeFan (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Man (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080125063246/http://www.celebritywonder.com/movie/2006_Little_Man_about_the_visual_effects.html to http://www.celebritywonder.com/movie/2006_Little_Man_about_the_visual_effects.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

calvin[edit]

In the plot section, Calvin is described as "very short" . Shouldn't we just say he has dwarfism? The link is included but maybe it should say "is a dwarf criminal" instead of saying very short.

｡ 🎀 𝒫𝓊𝓇𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝒹𝓃𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉𝓈 𝟣𝟩 🎀 ｡ (talk) 19:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Announcement[edit]

In light of recent streaks of vandalism in this article, i propose to have this article semi protected Scoophole2021 (talk). 08:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]