Talk:Loket Castle

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

No Footnotes[edit]

No offence, but you're three days late. [1] Could use your help once you're Czech. That'd be greatly appreciated ! Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Best regards, Krenakarore (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get what "you're three days late" is supposed to mean, but I'd be pleased to help by checking the spelling of some Czech words etc., but I'm not going to add footnotes or something. That requires research and time that I won't invest into it. I just wonder why you don't add the footnotes with the sources when you just added the content. You might use this to avoid confusion in the future. Cheers-- LYKANTROP ✉ 17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Loket[edit]

Dear friend, when I see there's sth missing here or there I provide it, instead of tagging the page and leave that missing thing yet to be done. A lotta people work on a certain article at the very same time over a period of days, weeks or months, so that every article is "always under construction". Your help is inestimable and I'd really like to work with you. Researching is sth that I enjoy doing 'cause I learn a lot from. As for the WP:Footnotes, I don't know what you mean. All citations are there and the so-called footnotes instantly appear on the respective Ref list.

Listen, there are a lotta pages about castles and chateaus that need to be expanded, diagramed (it's pretty much like a journal or magazine - when you align, resize the pics, move things about a bit so that the article looks better) so that everybody may have pleasure reading about it or even collecting a piece of information. It's not about creating an article, but about making it better ! You have the advantage of being Czech (my wife's czech and we live in Prague, do you ?) so, you can add content to an page by translating it from the corresponding Czech article. That's the case of Houska Castle - could you please?...:) !

As for the "you're three days late", that means that in three days Loket Castle was expanded from mere four lines to the way it loks today. I intend to add more content to the: "Loket, originally called Stein-Elbogen due to its rocky location..." section. You could check the article on the Cz-Wiki. That'd be wonderful ! Krenakarore (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That still doesn't explain what am I late for. Anyway, I didn't intend to make disarray by tagging that article. All I'm talking about is, that there were, and still are, whole sections without footnotes thus they seem to be unsourced (i.e "During the rule of Sigismund of Luxemburg", parts of "During the rule of Jiří Popel of Lobkowicz" and "From the 18th century up to modern times", all subsections of "Sections of the castle"); so I just wanted to give a notice to the editor who just did the research. Nothing more.-- LYKANTROP ✉ 21:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Krenakarore (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loket Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]