Talk:Lord's Bridge railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lord's Bridge railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Telescopes along the line[edit]

I have updated the page to clarify that the Mullard observatory existed concurrently with the railway, as it opened in 1957. Some of its rail-mounted telescopes, including the One-Mile and Half-Mile telescopes, were not using the line of the railway but rather of ex-RAF sidings to the south. I also removed mention of the AMI since this replaced the Ryle Telescope, rather than being (as was implied) an additional telescope existing concurrently. For now, mention of the CLFST is also removed as I can't tell whether it is built along the line or not. Finally I eliminated the mention that this was chosen for being "the nearest suitable abandoned line to Cambridge"; this may or may not be true (the Mildenhall Line was closer, but suitability unclear), but proximity to the existing MRAO was clearly also a factor. I would welcome well-sourced edits that can clarify this further. Stephen lamppost (talk) 18:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]