Talk:Lord of the Fries (card game)

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lord of the Fries[edit]

My copy of the game, which came in a white envelope with pink cardstock cards, has very few of these menu items listed. Are these all from a later version of the game? Travisl 00:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Backpic.jpg[edit]

Image:Backpic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Coverpic.jpg[edit]

Image:Coverpic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Lead Magazine[edit]

Why is this considered to be the cover for the game??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.16.86 (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Coverpic.jpg[edit]

Image:Coverpic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale was already there. Another user added some more text, and I added the redundant pointer back to the article. Travisl (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lord of the Fries → Lord of the fries (card game) – There is also a fast-food restaurant chain called Lord of the Fries in Melbourne, Australia. I would like to create a page for the restaurant. Mcartmel (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it make more sense to create that article first.--70.24.211.105 (talk) 03:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think you should create the restaurant article first, like at Lord of the Fries (restaurant), and move this article to Lord of the Fries (card game) and make "Lord of the Fries" a disambiguation page. There are several other uses for this title. Such as the Capitol Steps album, the 15/Love episode, the Tim Wynne-Jones book. 76.65.128.90 (talk) 09:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with above comment from 76.65.128.90 ῤerspeκὖlὖm in ænigmate_(talk)(spy) 09:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet. Or rather, if you create Lord of the Fries (restaurant) and it proves to be actually notable, we can then discuss which article readers are more likely to want. The anon above suggests good reasons to believe that there is no primary usage here; but there may be. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Separate the issues. The restaurant has only 5 locations, so it is unlikely to merit the article name Lord of the Fries. As above, the restaurant article should have a suffix of (restaurant); another dab link can be added to Lord of the Fries. What happens to the Lord of Fries page is a separate question. It may be appropriate to turn Lord of the Fries into a dab page if there is no dominant article among the current contenders. A look at the traffic stats should tell. Glrx (talk) 22:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lord of the Fries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]